Adidas Sued The Big Shoes "pseudo Adidas" A Result Of Retrial

Earlier, Limited to the court Adidas Adi Wang sporting goods (China) Co.

, Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Adi King Corporation), China Pearl (Quanzhou) Shoes Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Chinese pearl company), Guo Yanmei, etc. Three accused of trademark infringement and unfair competition. Recently, the Supreme People's Court made a ruling on the case retrial by the implementation of the Liaoning Provincial Higher People's Court for retrial. It is understood, August 19, 2008, Adidas Yingkou City, Liaoning Province to the Intermediate People's Court Adi King Corporation and other three defendants, the defendant requested the court to order the three to stop trademark infringement and Adidas Air Max 2009 used in commercial activities Wang, Germany Adi Wang (International) Sports Development Group Co., acts of unfair competition. In addition, Adidas has also accused the three claimants to the 100 million economic loss.

China Pearl in one of the defendants to submit pleadings to China during the Pearl Corporation, the company's domicile Adi Wang, producer of the product concerned are other grounds in Quanzhou, Fujian Province, Yingkou Intermediate People's Court to make objection to the jurisdiction of the case . The court held that, in this case, the Department of the Adi Adidas King of the company, Hua Zhu, and Guo Yanmei company indicted as a co-defendant, Guo Yanmei the behavior of the infringing products sold in the implementation of Yingkou City, Liaoning Province, so the hospital has jurisdiction over the case. Subsequently, the Adi Wang first instance ruled against the company to Nike Air Max challenge the jurisdiction of the case to the Liaoning Provincial Higher People's Court of Appeal. It is understood that the second instance court that the defendant Guo Yanmei behavior of the implementation of the allegedly infringing products in Yingkou City, Liaoning Province, Yingkou Intermediate People have jurisdiction. Department of foreign-related civil cases, but because the case, according to Supreme People's Court and the Liaoning Provincial Higher People's Court on the foreign jurisdiction in civil and commercial litigation cases, the relevant provisions of the urban area of Yingkou City, and other foreign-related cases of first instance, from Dalian City Intermediate People's Court jurisdiction.

May 16, 2009, the case was transferred to the jurisdiction of Dalian Intermediate People's Court, and in November 5, 2009 court session. During this period, Adidas objection to the jurisdiction of the Supreme People's Court retrial. April 21 this year, Dalian City Intermediate People's Court Wang Adidas Adidas v. Three companies accused of trademark infringement and unfair competition case first instance verdict. According to the verdict, the court finds that the request Adidas Adi Wang sued the company and other defendants constituted Nike Air Max 90 infringement and unfair competition, claiming six other appeals were rejected. Adidas followed in respect of the first instance verdict to the Liaoning Provincial Higher People's Court of Appeal. At present, the case is in the second trial phase.

by: slary

POST COMMENT

Black Ruffle Sweet Lolita Dress, Classic Lolita Dress Black Lace Bow Sweet Lolita Dress, Lolita Skirts White Sleeveless Lace Ruffles Sweet Lolita Dress, Gothic Lolita Dress White Cross-strap Ruffles Sweet Lolita Dress, Classic Lolita Dress Pink Sleeves Sweet Lolita Dress, Lolita Skirts Psi as a Product of Evolution Pink Sleeveless Bow Lace Sweet Lolita Dress, Lolita Skirts Pink Bow Lace Sweet Lolita Dress, Gothic Lolita Dress Blue Pintuck Lace Sweet Lolita Dress, Classic Lolita Dresses Pink Sleeveless Lace Sweet Lolita Dress, Classic Lolita Dress How To Dress To A Party Spaghetti Bow Ruffles Sweet Lolita Dress, Gothic Lolita Dress Sleeveless Bow Sweet Lolita Dress, Classic Lolita Dress