Welcome to YLOAN.COM
yloan.com » Artists » Alexandria DUI Virginia 18.2-266 Driving Under Influence Alcohol DMV
Shopping-and-Product-Reviews Music and Movies Artists Astrology Humanities Humor Language Philosophy Photography Poetry Tattoos Arts-and-Entertainment Singing poker video foreclosure television satellite toys horse belly culture interesting orchid collecting mastery fantastic fashion Casino-Gambling

Alexandria DUI Virginia 18.2-266 Driving Under Influence Alcohol DMV

Alexandria DUI Virginia 18.2-266 Driving Under Influence Alcohol DMV


MATHURIN NGOMONDJAMI v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Record No. 0500-08-4

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA


54 Va. App. 310

June 30, 2009, Decided

Issues:

Whether the trial court erred in not granting the defendant's proffered jury instruction defining "operating a motor vehicle?"

Whether the Commonwealth's evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to prove that the operated the vehicle?

Whether the trial court erred at the sentencing phase of the bifurcated jury trial by admitting the DMV record into evidence?

1) Whether the trial court erred in not granting the defendant proffered jury instruction defining "operating a motor vehicle"?

The court held that "the trial court did not err in refusing to grant appellant's proffered jury instruction. The instruction granted by the trial court fully and fairly covered the principles of law relevant to the question of whether appellant operated the car in which he was found, intoxicated and while the engine was running."

2) Whether the Commonwealth's evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to prove that the operated the vehicle?

The evidence at trial proved appellant was in his car and was intoxicated, that the key was in the ignition switch of his car, turned to the on position, and the car's engine was running. From this evidence, the jury could reasonably conclude appellant was in actual physical control of the car, and was "operating" it within the meaning of Code 18.2-266. Accordingly, we find the jury did not err in finding the evidence sufficient to convict appellant of DUI in Virginia in violation of Code 18.2-266

3) Whether the trial court erred at the sentencing phase of the bifurcated jury trial by admitting the DMV record into evidence?

The court held that the trial court did not err by admitting appellant's DMV record into evidence, since the notice requirements do not apply to the admission of a defendant's prior traffic record into evidence pursuant to Code 46.2-943.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm's unofficial views of the Justices' opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Barry Taylor accident attorney Virginia Beach Some Great Artists That Are Not Well Appreciated Test Generator Enjoy The Simplicity Of Generating Artistic Quiz How to Become a Graphic Artist Fuel Supplier in Virginia – Different Types of Fuel Reflecting coastal culture along the shores of Pacific Ocean, LA artists hope to take visitors beyond two-dimensional art with Oceans Four- Mixing Med How much money can I make as a Tattoo Artist? Alphonse Mucha – Czech Artist Virginia Driving Under Influence Eluding Police Alcohol Virginia Reckless Driving Interstate 495 High Rate Speed Disregarding Police Signal Eighty Five Mile Per Hour 46.2-862 46.2-817 Felony Driving Under Influence DUI Third Subsequent Offense Virginia DMV 18.2-266 18.2-270 Loudoun County Reckless Driving Speeding Virginia 46.2-862 Eighty Mile Per Hour 46.2-869 Improper Driving Tattoo Artist Guide: How To Become A Tattoo Artist
print
www.yloan.com guest:  register | login | search IP(216.73.216.142) California / Anaheim Processed in 0.017072 second(s), 7 queries , Gzip enabled , discuz 5.5 through PHP 8.3.9 , debug code: 34 , 2408, 117,
Alexandria DUI Virginia 18.2-266 Driving Under Influence Alcohol DMV Anaheim