Welcome to YLOAN.COM
yloan.com » Photography » Choosing For the Future of Stock Photography
Shopping-and-Product-Reviews Music and Movies Artists Astrology Humanities Humor Language Philosophy Photography Poetry Tattoos Arts-and-Entertainment Singing poker video foreclosure television satellite toys horse belly culture interesting orchid collecting mastery fantastic fashion Casino-Gambling

Choosing For the Future of Stock Photography

Choosing For the Future of Stock Photography


Social Networking, Stock Agencies and a Whole Lot of Images

I have recently been conducting searches on Getty, Corbis, SuperStock, BlendImages and iStockphoto to compare their offerings. In the case of the above-mentioned "traditional" stock agencies, I chose them because they carry my work.

I chose iStock because it is the first micro agency most people think of. In many cases the images offered by iStock are far greater in both numbers and in creativity than the photos I could find from the traditional stock agencies. Look up "social networking" on Getty, for example, and you get 84 results. Do the same search on Corbis and you get 92 results (interestingly SuperStock came back with 238 images and a surprising variety to choose from).


Blend Images has 21 images, which considering its smaller and more-targeted collection isn't bad. Look up social networking on iStock and you get 2,443. Yeah, there are some sketchy images there, but there are a whole lot of great pictures as welland Corbis and Getty also have their share of junk. On iStock, however, you get a much, much greater range of photos to search from.

Hundreds of Thousands of Shooters and Greater Choices

Increasingly, at least as far as I can see, the micro sites are offering greater choices, and, at least in some cases, better choices as well. It seems logicalhundreds of thousands of shooters contributing photos to an agency as opposed to thousands.

So if you are an art director, art buyer, designer or even small businesswoman (or businessman) looking for images, and you can find more and better ones (not to mention less expensive) at micro siteswouldn't you go there? Am I missing something here?

Traditional Stock, Micro Sites and a Strategy

One strategy for us traditional shooters might be to begin to put images up on micro sites and to start to build a presence there just in case that scenario actually happens. For me, it is really hard to pull the trigger on that.

I am still doing quite well in traditional stock and as I create relatively few images, I still feel that I am better off now in the RM and RF markets. But what about two or three years from nowwill I wish that I had created a body of work that could have been moving up in the search results all this time?

Room for a Higher Priced Offering

Apparently the upscale Vetta collection at iStock is doing very well, fantastically well even. The higher prices seem to be no deterrent to those licensing micro stock. I don't find that terribly surprisingmicro prices started at such low levels it makes sense that there is room for a higher priced offering.

In traditional stock it has always been a given that price was not the determining factor in the licensing of an imagebut rather the photograph being the right one.

Lesser Images and More Competition

If I do eventually cave in to my fears (or logic?), and overcome my ego problems with placing a low monetary value (at least per licensing) on my imagery and begin to contribute to micro sites, should I do the same kind of work I am doing for my RM and RF agencies? There is the temptation to contribute "lesser" images to micro, and yet I suspect that doing so would condemn me to failure in micro.


After all, in micro there is even more competitionand the added problem of, as a beginner, not having high rankings in search returns. Too, while some of the most popular photographs and illustrations on the micro sites have some pretty phenomenal download rates, it seems (at least to me) that the number of images that return stellar and even reasonable returns falls off rather quickly.

High Volume and Higher Price Points

Wouldn't it be nice if there were a way to tap into the high volume of micro with a higher price point? Micro stock agencies are leaving a lot of money on the tablemoney that could go a long ways towards moving stock photography back in the direction of profitability for photographers.

There are a lot of very smart and talented people in this industry, so it isn't far fetched to think that just such a scenario might be right around the corner
Advantages of Taking Photos in a Photography Studio Cardiff Some Thoughts On Graphic Images And Using Them On Web Pages Photography is a art Best Point and Shoot Camera - The Best Guide to Reliable Purchase Decision Create your own art gallery Dealextreme Helps You Care Camera Lens Security Cameras Systems: Your Eyes When You're Away New FLUKE TiS thermal imager breaks $2500 price barrier for imagers meeting proposed RESNET standard Olympus Camera Case Becoming An Image Consultant Pink Camera Case Do's And Don'ts While Recovering Deleted Pictures Coolpix S1100PJ the Best Projector Camera By Nikon
print
www.yloan.com guest:  register | login | search IP(216.73.216.26) California / Anaheim Processed in 0.031172 second(s), 7 queries , Gzip enabled , discuz 5.5 through PHP 8.3.9 , debug code: 38 , 4317, 123,
Choosing For the Future of Stock Photography Anaheim