Comparing the GBC CombBind C20 and Fellowes Pulsar 300 Comb Binding Machines

General Binding Corporation (GBC) makes some of the best plastic comb binding machines

available and they recently released a great new product: the CombBind C20. The C20 is getting a lot of attention so we were curious to see how this device compares to a similar device, the Fellowes Pulsar 300. Here's what we found out so you can decide if one of them is right for you.

Punching and binding capacities: The C20 and Pulsar have very similar punching and binding capacities but the former definitely has the advantage in this category. The GBC machine can punch 20 sheets and bind 320 while the Fellowes device can punch 15 and bind 300. Both of these binders have vertical punching mechanisms to ensure accurate punching.

Ease of use: The C20 is easier to use than the Pulsar because it has all the instructions you need printed right on it. It also has a color-coded comb selector so you can figure out which comb is best for your document. Also, this device has an ergonomically friendly handle that's perfect for both right- and left-handed users. The Fellowes machine lacks the on-board instructions and while it has a comb selector, it's not color-coded. Its handle also leaves something to be desired because it's located on the right side of the device.

Size and appearance: The C20 is slightly larger than the other device because it measures 22" (weight) x 9" (height) x 19" (depth). (The Pulsar's approximate dimensions are 5" x 18" x 15".) The GBC device is definitely the more flashy of the two thanks to its black and silver styling that's accented by bright bursts of color. Meanwhile, the Fellowes device is white and silver and isn't as eye-catching as the other machine. So if looks matter, the GBC product would be a better choice.

Odds and ends: Neither one of these devices is equipped with disengageable dies nor do they have open throats. The Pulsar has a pull-out tray in which you can store several combs, something the C20 lacks.

Price and warranty: The C20 is a little bit more expensive than the Pulsar. It's priced at just under $300.00 while the Fellowes machine goes for less than $230.00. Also, it has a two-year warranty while the other product is covered for just one year.

Both the GBC CombBind C12 and Fellowes Pulsar 300 are good comb binding machines that are very similar. However, the GBC machine would be a better choice for several reasons. First, its binding and punching capacities are higher. Second, it has instructions printed right on it so you won't have to hunt down the owner's manual when you need help. Third, it's more visually interesting and has an ergonomically friendly handle. However, you'll want to consider what the Pulsar 300 has to offer, such as its lower price and longer warranty. But no matter which machine you choose, you can be sure you're getting a high-quality comb binding machine that can help you finish your documents.

Comparing the GBC CombBind C20 and Fellowes Pulsar 300 Comb Binding Machines

By: Jeff McRitchie

POST COMMENT

Five Reasons to Check Out the GBC CombBind C20 Comb Binding Machine Rating the GBC CombBind C20 Comb Binding Machine Weighing Machines How Punching Capacities of Different Binding Machines Stack Up Containers Fillling Machine The Truth On Getting A Toned Stomach To Improve Machine Efficiency, From Machine Tools And Cutting Tools Sewing Machine Scores Yushu Gong Peng Zhen Agricultural Machinery hydraulic oil purifier machine / oil purification plant / oil regeneration system / oil filtration unit / oil processing set We Cant Win The War In Afghanistan Without Diplomacy Grinding mill machines introduction and grinding mill manufacturer Roller mill machine