Dna Analysis Makes The Bigfoot Possibly
The United States " DNA diagnosis " ( DNA Diagnostics ) released a press release out
, genetic test results confirmed the legendary Bigfoot is human relatives, in about 15000 years ago. This study is from the Texas state veterinarian Melba Ketechemu. She points out that an unknown Terran animal once and modern man in the female mating, bred a bushy Terran mestizo, also known as Bigfoot. However, the scientific community to the point that a skeptical.
" DNA diagnosis " company released the press release says: " a group of scientists through the 5 year DNA studies confirmed the peculiar Terran half-breed do exist, often referred to as the ' Bigfoot ' or ' Bigfoot ', lived in North America .DNA sequencing studies revealed the legendary North American savage is the closest relatives to humans, appeared about 15000 years ago "
For this study, Ketechemu from alleged Bigfoot samples extracted with 3 complete nuclear genome. Genome sequencing results show Bigfoot mtDNA and modern Homo sapiens, but nuDNA is unique, from a homo sapiens and other primate animal in kinship unknown Terran animal. Press release: " our data suggest a Sasquatch was a half-breed, father is an unknown human animal, mother is Homo sapiens. " ( mtDNA refers to the mitochondria, located in generating energy in the cell structure, usually by the mother to her offspring .NuDNA nuclear DNA, located in nuclei, father and mother can be to her offspring. )
Ketechemu research papers yet in any peer-reviewed scientific journals published, nor was there any indication that she will in this paper is published on periodical acquisition data. If the study has scientific meaning, any known scientific journals will take the initiative to the olive branch, hope to be able to take the lead in published this groundbreaking research found that until now, Ketechemu still refuses to let anyone see her evidence.
Bigfoot has been shrouded in mystery, and Bigfoot are related to the presence of evidence or exaggerated, or very not mature. For decades, the so-called " final and conclusive evidence " emerge in an endless stream, such as Bigfoot hair, blood and corpses. However, all the evidence is either a practical joke, either the identification error or not decisive. Ketechemushang unpublished studies concerning their discovery of any information, other experts also had no effect on her studies for review, therefore, to assess the reliability of the conclusion is not possible. However, we can in her statement found an important clue, namely " Bigfoot mtDNA and modern Homo sapiens same ". If the detection result is indeed the case, we can draw two conclusions. First, Bigfoot ancestors about 15000 years ago and the modern female in mating, bred a half hybrid, still live in North America. Cotter penetration, we hold this view. Another is, the sample is polluted.
No matter samples from where -- Bigfoot, bear, human or other sources -- researchers in the collection and processing of the sample may have inadvertently led to their DNA contamination of samples, such as saliva, sneezing or coughing. Ketechemu outside the study team is not clear to anyone called Bigfoot DNA from why and come, and by whom. They use samples may be collected by the world's top forensic experts gather, may also come from has not received any evidence collected training Bigfoot fans.
Ketechemu et al. How to confirm samples from Bigfoot? Whether from a living monster on the extraction of blood or saliva samples? If the answer is yes, how did they find Bigfoot, and why not catch it or take a photo? If the sample is collected in the wild, how do they know that no other animal left behind, or by hunters, hikers and campers stay human genetic material?
Previously collected alleged Bigfoot samples after DNA detection are marked " unknown " or " unknown " tag. " Unknown " or " unknown " does not mean that the samples from Bigfoot .DNA sample detection finally draws the conclusion of the " unknown " for many reasons, such as contamination or degradation due to environmental factors, samples in laboratory animal is not used for comparison to a reference sample list. Because no Bigfoot DNA samples as reference, also cannot be decisive.
Ketechemu issued a statement calling for the United States government, immediately to the Bigfoot classified as " native ", take protective measures, give them the " constitution " stipulates the rights, banned hunting and trapping Bigfoot. Since no trapping or killing the monster, now can not determine the Bigfoot -- if any -- whether the need for any special protection.
In addition to Ketechemu, other scientists through genetic testing means of searching for Bigfoot in early.2012, University of Oxford and Lausanne Animal Science Museum researchers announced they collected called Bigfoot and Yeti fur samples, will undertake gene identification of.5 months to September, University of Oxford geneticist Brian CECOS samples collected from the public, ongoing DNA analysis of the results. Once, he plans to checks peer-reviewed scientific journals thesis submitted. If Ketechemu have conclusive evidence, we could soon know what evidence, Bigfoot mystery will also be opened. If found no evidence or the evidence is not conclusive and the presence of defects, searching for Bigfoot 's journey will continue.
by: DJDROGBA
Bio Disk Analysis - One More Fraud By Qnet Or Financial Analysis Report On Shin Shin Co., Ltd Financial Analysis Report On Rock Field Co Ltd Financial Analysis Report On Okamoto Industries,inc. Future Development Of Wireless Temperature Sensor Predictive Analysis Competitor Analysis On Harvard International Plc - Company Capsule Swot Analysis Report On Duros S.a. - Company Capsule Swot Analysis Report On Duros S.a. - Company Capsule Three Benefits Found With Trading News Analysis Three Benefits Found With Trading News Analysis Worst Class In Wow About Analysis Worst Class In Wow About Analysis Divorce Asset Analysis: Buried Treasures