Frowning On Reciprocal Linking From Google
This is a subject that everyone seems to be arguing about at the moment
. Everyone trying to second-guess Google's actions - which they will NEVER do - and wondering whether reciprocal linking is dead, dying or if it is something worth carrying on.
'Nuff of the speculation. Here's the proof.
Google do not like reciprocal link directories and they can sniff one out a mile off. There was (notice the use of the past tense here) a link directory on my site until recently, but I have now removed it, because it had become as useful as a chocolate teapot.
Whilst the main front page of the site has retained it's Google PageRank of PR5, in one of their last updates, Google relegated that directory, which had also previously had a PR5, to a PR 0.
Meanwhile, I had not altered my linking structure that pointed to it. I had not altered my policies either: I did not link TO any PR0 sites, kept the number of links per page down to a minimum and there were even text descriptions for each entry listed.
Google could tell what it was and acted as they saw fit.
There is no point wondering or whining about it. They can and they are doing so in order to provide better results to searchers. You can like it or lump it, but if you want them to give you decent listings, ranks or send you any traffic, their rules count.
My advice: forget *artificial* reciprocal linking completely. The time taken to maintain the directory, approve/disaprove submissions (mostly the latter, because the only people still asking for links are crappy PR0 sites and spammers) can be much better spent.
When you want to exchange links with other sites, make sure you do so in a natural way, by which I mean write about the other site in some way and place natural links within the body text.
And consider just giving to get. By which I mean, link out to useful things for the edification or entertainment of your visitors giving no consideration to the immediate usefulness of that link to you.
What goes around will come around. Once you are seen as useful, others will link to you. You do then get your links "reciprocated", but it may not be from the same people to whom you linked.
That is the natural way of linking that Google wants to see.
Do not, under any circumstances, maintain anything (other than internal navigation) that could look like merely a list of links / link farm, because Google will find it, won't like it and will penalize it.
Reciprocal linking, in the form of lists or directories merely created for that very purpose cannot do anything to help you with Google (quite the opposite, in fact) and therefore, est mortuus. [RIP]
Frowning On Reciprocal Linking From Google
By: Jaden Santon
Can You Trust The "Get Rich Quick with Google Adsense" E-Books? Google And Search Today Does Google Have too much power? Using Google Keyword Tool for Search Term Research Tracking Your Google Analytics Key Phrases Using Excel Are Reciprocal Links Helpful For Google Pagerank? The Number 1 Spot in Google Rankings with the Help of Seo Experts Effective SEO Techniques in the Google Caffeine Updated Era SEO Fundamentals - Top 20 Factors to Better Google Rankings Google Latest Revamp in the Organic Search Using Google to Find a Local Chiropractor and Then How to Choose the Best Chiropractor For You How To Get A Free Google Adwords Coupon Easily What Google Isn't Telling You About The Easiest And Fastest Way On Getting Popular Searched Short An