Welcome to YLOAN.COM
yloan.com » Ezine-Publishing » History Of The Federal Income Tax
Online Business Site Promotion Web misc Affiliate-Revenue Auctions Audio-Streaming Autoresponders Blogging-Rss Email-Marketing Ezine-Publishing Forums Internet-Marketing List-Building PPC-Advertising Podcasting SEO Spam-Blocker Traffic-Building Video-Streaming Web-Design Web-Development Web-Hosting Domain Name soreness web analysis vinyl mlm searching media info spyware access microsoft outlook farmville

History Of The Federal Income Tax

History Of The Federal Income Tax

History Of The Federal Income Tax

Arguments about the meaning of the current income tax has continued for nearly 100 years. Courts are reluctant to support a literal reading of the tax laws in favor of potential taxpayers, since it can lead to tax avoidance. Professor Soled points out why judicial doctrines are used against tax avoidance strategies in general,

"The use of judicial doctrines to curtail tax avoidance is pervasive in the area of income taxation. There are several reasons for this phenomenon: central among them is that courts believe that if the Internal Revenue Code ("Code") were read literally, impermissible tax avoidance would become the norm rather than the exception. No matter how perceptive the legislature, it cannot anticipate all events and circumstances that may unfold, and, due to linguistic limitations, statutes do not always capture the essence of what is intended. Judicial doctrines fill the void left either by the legislature or by the words of the Code. Another reason for the popularity of these doctrines is that courts do not want to appear duped by taxpayers..." (Jay A. Soled, Use of Judicial Doctrines in Resolving Transfer Tax Controversies, 42 B.C. L. Rev 587, 588-589 (2001).)

Of course, if the intent of Congress was to actually reach all income then the simplest way to state s. 61 would be "all income ***however realized.***" Instead, s. 61 mentions sources and other sections of the federal tax code actually lists about 20 sources of income that are specifically taxed. (26 USC ss. 861-864.) A common rule of statutory interpretation is the doctrine inclusio unius est exclusio alterius. This doctrine means "[t]he inclusion of one is the exclusion of another...This doctrine decrees that where law expressly describes [a] particular situation to which it shall apply, an irrefutable inference must be drawn that what is omitted or excluded was intended to be omitted or excluded." (Black's Law Dictionary 763 (6th Ed. 1990).) Since particular sources are listed as taxable in the tax law, then it is reasonable to infer that other sources of income are excluded from taxation. This argument is called the "861 source argument" and the courts refuse to analyze the argument despite consistently holding against it, even going so far as to issue restraining orders against people who publish websites about it. (U.S. v. Bell, 238 F.Supp.2d 696, 698 (M.D. Pa. 2003).''

In 1913 the tax rate was 1 percent on taxable net income above $3,000 ($4,000 for married couples), less deductions and exemptions. It rose to a rate of 7 percent on incomes above $500,000.

During World War I the top rate rose to 77 percent; following the war, the top rate was scaled down (to a low of 25 percent).

During the Great Depression and World War II, the top income tax rate rose again, reaching 91% during the war; this top rate remained in effect until 1964.

In 1964 the top rate was decreased to 70% (1964 Revenue Act), and then to 50% in 1981 (Economic Recovery Tax Act or ERTA).

The Tax Reform Act of 1986 reduced the top rate to 28%, at the same time raising the bottom rate from 11% to 15% (in fact 15% and 28% became the only two tax brackets).


During the 1990s the top rate rose again, standing at 39.6% by the end of the decade.

In 2001 the top rate was cut to 35% and the bottom rate was cut to 10% by the EGTRRA, or Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act.

In 2003 the JGTRRA, or Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act, was passed, expanding the 10% tax bracket and accelerating some of the changes passed in the 2001 EGTRRA.

For more free legal information on Tax Law, please visit Free Legal Information.
Which and what Type of Article Directories to be selected? Have A Harry Potter Party With Harry Potter Invitations And Party Supplies Bust Liars Ebook Golf Swing Guru Ebook - Golf Swing Guru Workout Buy Facebook Fans - Why, How and Where What is the History of WordPress Suited Guideline About PLR Products And Ebooks Valid Lead Related To PLR Merchandise And Ebooks Ovarian Cyst Miracle Book - Ovarian Cyst Miracle Rapidshare Follow Article Submission Guidelines that Help you in approving your article The History of Unicel - Originally Printed in Swimming Pool - Spa Age, July 1997 The Lotto Black Ebook Facebook sign in
print
www.yloan.com guest:  register | login | search IP(216.73.216.125) California / Anaheim Processed in 0.026092 second(s), 7 queries , Gzip enabled , discuz 5.5 through PHP 8.3.9 , debug code: 25 , 3825, 230,
History Of The Federal Income Tax Anaheim