Improvingbeyond Standard Cancer Statistics Best Results In Stage 4 Cancer Outcomes And Quality Of Li

Most cancer and Stage 4 cancer patients will look at outcomes to help them identify theiroptimal treatment facility

. This article goes far beyond the numbers, giving patients a deep understanding of how to evaluate their options and statistically improve their cancer outcomes.

Envitas decade plus of working with advanced and Stage 4 cancers most complex cases is ideal to provide you with physician-direct perspective on comparing conventional and alternative cancer centers and determining what is best for you.

Our approach concentrates on pointing out therapies and treatments that regularly provide statistical and biological advantages for patients suffering with various cancer types.

==> Cancer Treatment Statistics Can be Deceiving

There are many reasons why statistically significant doesnt necessarily mean improvement in your condition or life. One must first determine whether the correct factors are being examined in the provided survival data. For example, is the response rate offered for a specific cancer types treatment regimenshort-lived or sustained with significant improvement inlife quality?

The real problem is that many of these cancer treatment "responses" can often be temporary, or even fleeting. Even among patients with cancers of identical stage and type can there are often different response rates based on the behavior and genetic variations of each persons tumors. This is an important thought to consider as it touches on the model specifically used by cancer hospitals and drug companies as you can tell, however, it comes with significant flaws.

The notion of response rates being deceiving, closely mirrors a more fundamental problem with cancer statistics as a whole. Envita Medical Centers makes survival and overall quality of life for patients, our most important measures of success.

==> Here is an Example of Static Problems Cancer Treatment - Proving the Point

Hereis an example to demonstrate some of the problems with a statics basedresponse to cancer treatment:

Treatment Protocol 1 (TP1) has 35 percent rate of response while Treatment Protocol 2 (TP2) has a 75 percent rate. However, if we find TP2 is short-lived, it certainly does not mean that it is a better treatment. Moreover, if TP2 is far more toxic than TP1, it is likely that the quality of life for TP2 patients will be considerably lower.

Thesegames of data manipulation and telling only part of the story, are often played by pharmaceutical companies and cancer centers to bring patients in.

Other cancer centershave adopted the approach of implementing will special criteria to skew their results.For example, their data information may statepatients that completedour protocol. This is an indication that unscrupulous tactics were implemented to create exclusionary criteria, thereby diminishing undesirable outcomes and appearing better at first glance.

Statics are regularly manipulated in numerous ways -it is not uncommon to see organizations show enhanced results by including tricky (or concealing relevant) survival data.

Without specific calculation criteria, results are unreliable at best making such criteria absolutely critical for objective comparison. Keep in mind, if it looks too good to be true, it likely is.

==> Statics That Matter: The Bottom Line Is - Patients Can Improve Their Statics and Save Their LivesWith Cancer Treatment

In our experience, what patients are seriously askingfor is the best treatments available to help them find remission, achieve a cure, and live. That pretty much is the bottom line.

So, exercise caution with the statistical data and white papers that you read. We have found that, no matter how large or smallthe organization, the data provided by medical groups can be somewhat deceiving andlikely far more convoluted then they appear particularly those sources made available online.

It is important to systematically consider both conventional and alternative medicine and discuss the true game changers that may statically and significantly help you to achieve yourgoal.

Remember, cancer is individualized and cannotbe neatly ushered into broad categories of type and stage. This can be seen in latest treatments for cancer being administered around the world. Genetic and personalized immunotherapies are beginning to replace the one size fits all models because their results are superior.

Why is this true? Because every patient is different including their respective cancers causative agents, their tumor'sspecific metabolism,and even the way the patient handles side effects. There is no question that the future of cancer treatment is personalization, and Envita is leading the way.

==> Stage 4 Cancer Treatments Impact Statistics Conventional and Alternative

Looking at the Standard of Care for Cancer Treatment

==> Report Shows Conventional Cancer Treatment Centers - Worst SEER Statistical Scores

There is a lot of fear surrounding cancer treatment. Much of this stigma comes from poor results, standardized treatment plans, abysmal side effects, no customization, disease recurrence, and of course, the loss of life.

A major fault of traditional cancer treatment is its singular focus on tumor "response" or shrinkage. In fact, research has shown "response" does not necessarily correlate to increased survival time in adults.

When we hear that a traditional cancer treatment has had a 20% or 30% success rate with late-stage cancer, in actuality that means patients have only experienced a 20-30% "response" rate, or tumor shrinkage. This statistically has little or nothing to do with the patients' quality of life or survival time. In our opinion, this misconception is largely responsible for the poor results found in the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database report. The SEER web site can be accessed at seer.cancer.gov.

==> A Deeper Look at SEER Trends in Conventional Cancer Centers

Some cancer centers areposting how their results are better than the conventional system or SEER numbers. That is not hard to do, particularly as it applies to late stage or Stage 4 cancers.

Doctors Faguet and Morgan* have clearly demonstrated that chemotherapy is only 2% effective in the treatment of late-stage and Stage 4 cancer, for a 5-year survival periodor better. For this reason, most centers do not dare report beyond 2-3 years let alone 5 beyond initial diagnosis quite simply the results are not going to be in their favor.

Just to provide some perspective, Envitas typical patient is entering our medical center 2-3 years after initial diagnosis and is often refractory to conventional and many times refractory to several alternative therapies. For this reason, Envita is extremely qualified to point out those treatments that are truly statistic beaters for patients. It is our contention that the sooner patients incorporate them into their treatment plans, the more likely the chance for exponential improvements to manifest beyond statistical expectations.Hereunto forward, all data discussed will be for Stage 4 cancers.

Please note that the percentages provided in the following chapters are estimates (approximates) and not exact, as each patient is different and may not respond to a particular conventional or alternative treatment. Additionally, it should be understood that various details also impact the improvements to survival outcomes and patient quality of life. The purpose of this article is not to cover every treatment offered, rather provide some important examples to provideclear perspective as well as some definitive bearings by which to assist throughout the information gathering process.

Part I conventional Chemotherapy

==> Outperforming SEER NumbersthroughEnhanced Conventional Treatments with Chemotherapy - 75%Improvement for Most Cancers

At Envita, wepride ourselves on providing state-of-the-artconventional and advanced alternative medicine for cancer what we call integrative medicine. Two of the most common conventional therapies are chemo and radio (radiation.)

By the time most patientsarrive at Envita, they are either frightened by or turned off by these traditional treatment protocols, by and large, because of their own poor experiences.And while Envita has options to help patients steer clear of these treatments chemotherapy and radiation can play both important and effective roleswhen used minimally - not as the lone treatment.

==> Second Method to Outperform SEER Numberswith Chemotherapy Cancer Treatment

Chemotherapy iswidely used by the biggest and most well-recognized hospitals as a staple for cancer treatments. However, the protocols they follow are derived from large group averages. The resultant problem with this model is that our genetic and molecular testing on Stage 4 cancer shows that75% of patientswere clearly administeredthe wrongchemotherapy one wholly ineffective for their specific cancer genetics and metabolism.

As a result, these patients suffer needlessly with heavy side effects, compromised quality of life, and substandard results, all while their statistics spiral downward.

Moreover, these patients were likely being reassured, all the while, that their chemotherapy was working (at least in the short-term) or having a response.Really all the treatment had rendered was making the cancer and tumor more resistant.

By correctly utilizing Envitas comprehensive strategy and implementing genetic and molecular profiling,we immediately seemajor improvements in drugchoicesanda quantum leap toward superior, long-term effectiveness. To what degree?Roughly a 40% boost to statics across the board.

We envision a future where this will be the only method by which chemotherapy will be administered. In the meantime, while pharmaceutical companies and politics have a stronghold, we will continue to see the business machine satisfied to sell huge quantities of ineffective drugs for Stage 4 cancers - maintaining the game of large protocols as the standard.

==> 40% Average Specificity Increase with Genetic and Molecular Profiling

The second major problem with chemotherapy comes part and parcel with the all-too-typical practice of immediately administeringlarge doses rather than the more practical and effective technique calling for low micro doses using insulin potentiation. By directly targeting the specific cancer cells in such a manner, it is possible to achievemaximum benefit while minimizing side effects. Envitas proprietary technique,GTF (genetically targeted Fractioned Chemotherapy),pairs molecular genetic testing and thecancer cells sugar metabolism to target them directly.

The end result is far fewer side effects coupled with a considerably higher quality of life and a greatly enhanced opportunity for long-term survival.

==> GTFCan Provide 75% Improvement in Life Quality and Survival Time for Stage 4 Cancer Patients

GTF can provide a 75% overall average improvement over the SEER report for Stage 4 cancers, starting 3 years after initial diagnosis. At Envita, we customarily receive patients from 2-3 years, post-diagnosis, as most are channeled through standard methods until they have personally recognized them to be unsatisfactory.

Part II Conventional Radiation treatment

==> Outperforming SEER Numbers by 75-80% with Newest in Conventional Radiation Treatment

Generally speaking, radiation treatment tends to be the most misunderstood therapy treatment. Lack of understanding contributes to poor cancer patient statistics at all stages.

There are two main areas to understand with radiation:

1. Radiation therapy is often improperly prescribed because the surgeon or other care provider uses their own treatment method oftentimes one that is cancer approved, but not necessarily ideal for the patient. Consider, for a moment, a scenario wherea prostate cancer patient would be prescribed robotic surgery or radiation seed therapywhen, in fact, (if size and location are appropriate) they would respond far better to cyber knife radiation. This non-invasive technique could provide life-changing results and be done with no down time or side effects.

If they were not made aware of all their options they would likely have been faced with the standard several weeks of down time/ recovery that comes with the robotic surgery, including the plausibility of uncomfortable complications. Moreover, this was only an example of an obvious, early stage cancer with many possibilities for remission. Imagine the outcome if all the best options were not weighed in a case of Stage 4 cancer planning it could be far worse than the extra two weeks in bed and discomfort. In fact, it could prove lethal.

It should also be pointed out about the above example, that cyber knife decreases the chance of metastasis due to the absence of surgical removal. As radiation technology improves dramatically, the key is to target the tumor(s) without administering too much whole-bodyradiation while keeping the immune system intact. When used correctly, extension of life and its quality therewith, can dramatically change a Stage 4 statistic particularly when combined with targeted immunotherapy. At Envita, we have seen such methodology bring about remissions, even in late-stagedisease.

2.Radiation can be an expensive propositionfor a hospital or cancer groups. If they own the equipment and a billing code, they will use it. This therapy type is among the most profitable for cancer hospitals and it was estimated that Cancer Centers of America bills - as much as 600 million every 6 months in tomotherapy alone.

However, just because a hospital owns a particular machine or device, does not necessarily mean it is ideal for a given patients condition. Rather, what we see instead are patients being administered treatments without being provided superior options that may very well be available.

It is indisputable that the wrong radiation can cause extreme side effects and a significant decline in immune function. In Stage 4 cancer, that can be devastating.

At Envita, we have top radiation oncologyconsultants, and access to all the latest technology in targeted,next-generation,radiation therapy including tomothearpy, cyber knife,and proton beam without being fiscally overstressed. That provides Envita the luxury of putting patients first, and having the ability to incorporate properly timed immunotherapyto improve results.

Should radiation beconsideredat Envita,it is done with definitive plans to knock out tumors quickly with the lowest possible total body doses, thereby leaving the immune system intact. In the past, we have helped many patients avoid surgery in early diseasestages while decreasing the risk of metastasis and serious side effects. The precision of modern-dayequipment is accurate within1mm and with virtually no collateral damage.

At Envita, we implement a trulyintegrative and advanced approach to cancer treatment. Correct combinations are critical to helping patients improve their overall outcomes.

==> A Look at Improving Statistical Outcomeswith Alternative Cancer Centers

Simply put, Envita Medical Centers is among (if not the most) advanced alterative cancer treatment centers in the world.Our proprietary alternative medicine methods and treatments make all the difference in the world, improving statistics across the board. We can help you evaluate what is best for your specific condition.

So what is truly the best way to compare alternative cancer centers beyond relying upon easily skewed statistics? To begin, it is wise to determining if their focus is committed to improving quality of life and survival for their patients.

==> How Vitamin C and Ozone Therapy as Cancer Treatments Can Enhance Statics: Up to 70% Life Quality, 50% Survival Time

Oxidative therapies should be staples in the treatment ofmanycancers. However, only alternative medical centers across the globe take advantage of them. Vitamin C works on many levels as a natural form of chemotherapy and, when aided with ultraviolet light, can really improve the action on other conventional treatments by increasing reactive oxygen species.

To learn more about these therapies, please visit our peer reviewed vitamin C and Ozone articles.

==> Overview - Why Vitamin C Oxidative Therapies Dont Always Work in Cancer Treatment

At Envita, we offer our own speed drip technology and sustained release intravenous Vitamin C delivery demonstrated to significantly outperform all others. One Envita treatment is roughly 4 times more therapeutic.

However, there are several reasons thatoxidative therapymight not working on all patients at least initially. Some tumors produce larger amounts of enzyme catalase, preventing the beneficial oxidizing effect of hydrogen peroxide produced by high-dose Vitamin C. This can widely be remedied by initially administering ozone therapy, thereby increasing Vitamin C efficacy.

The other problem that stand in the way of oxidative therapy resultsstems from not having enough oxygen outside the cell for the Vitamin C to produce toxic hydrogen peroxide on the tumor. Again, by using ozone properly, prior to the Vitamin C dosing, this obstacle may be corrected.

With this approach, it is possible for some patients to realize and maintain remission.

==> Recognizing Whos Who in the World of Cancer Treatments by What Else - Their Treatments

You need not look further than the treatments a center offers (and the scope and range of their doctors) to determine why they may (or may not) get desirable results. Once you have, you better able to evaluate your options.

==> Chemotherapy Sensitivity Screening and Target Radiation

Treatments provided by hospitals and cancer centers that do heavy advertising are usually limited to their own equipment. They may own old or new but will use them liberally, as long as they have their own billing codes.

At Envita, we provide patients with a full spectrum of options the very best available. Wepersonalize and tailor your treatment to help you and even work to limit chemotherapy and radiation administering only when needed, as there are many other tools available to enhance results. In simple terms, we are the alternative medicine experts.

==> Other Alternative Therapies Being Researched as Cancer Treatments

Most alternative centers offer ahigh-doseVitamin C treatment to their patients. Some may also administer ozone therapy, depending on their state and licensure. Those are always good to see from the start.

However,during your search, you may run across things like mistletoe treatment, Resveratrol treatment, Sodium Bicarbonate treatments, and myriad supplements and teas. And while many of these therapies mentioned may have their place with correct application and setting, ultimately not one of them has been a hit c

by: Nilson Brook

POST COMMENT

Animal Removal Problems And How To Deal With Them Get All Your Help And Support Through Tax Filing Software Making The Right Decisions For Your Conference Including Simultaneous Translation And Interpretation Town Or City Lapel Pins Help Educate, Promote, And Give Pride To Their Residents You Can Do Simple Woodwork Projects And Save Money Acknowledging The Importance Of Hot And Cold Therapy Two Secret Tips For Selling Your Home Quickly And Easily 2 Questions That Should Be Asked In The Region Of E-books And Ibook Kids Japan And South Korea Football Wind Blow Into Europe Know The Valuation On Your Engagement Rings, Bullion Bars, And Also Other Precious Items Save Money With Online Gaming For Kids And Teens A Wedding Suit Hire Shop Can Helps You Save Time And Expense Medical Coding Services For Surgeons And Surgery Centers