Is it the end for high-end stock photography production?

I asked three stock industry stalwarts, what they think will happen to expensive shoots

. High-end production: Is it dead, or just sleeping? After all we haven't seen any or much of it for a while now.

Here are the answers they gave.

Steve Pigeon, President & Founder Masterfile:

"I don't believe low price stock images will kill big and expensiveproductions completely, but those productions are sure to become a lot morescarce. In a normal world, scarcity would drive up the value of thoseproductions but this isn't a normal world. There's a good chance thatscarcity of big ticket stock image productions will drive clients back tocommercial assignments - which is something that pro photographers have been waiting 30 years to see! So the wheel has come full circle: Assignment --> RM stock --> RF stock --> Microstock --> Assignment. That may be an over simplification since all licensing models are going to coexist to somedegree, but I do believe we will see a resurgence in assignment photographyin the next decade. Wouldn't it be ironic if the ascendance of $1 images iswhat drives clients back to doing $25,000 commercial shoots?"

Glenn Parker, CEO Photolibrary:

I think the point is not so much this supposed "low priced" stockimages that has killed the independent production companies but rather amove back towards a traditional model. (BTW we don't agree it is all doomand gloom at a pricing level and we have seen the decline stop especiallyover the past year).

When there were production companies the big word was "wholly owned" because it presumably gave the production house flexibility in pricing anddistribution (plus to be honest it was seen as a quick money spinner as youwere always open to be bought!!). Those days have gone. We still get goodquality highly stylized content but it is now from either individualphotographers who are paid a commission or from photographer groups whoagain are paid a commission on their work.

So there is money to be made from "image creation" rather than using theword "production" at an individual photographer level as they will be morecognizant on costs. However not at a corporate production company level likethe old days aka Jupiter etc. The expensive bit for the old production companies was not so much in the variable cost of the shoot but the after work. The editors, keyworders, retouchers, pre production staff, finance people to make sure everything was spent correctly, executives who then had to manage the whole thing etc. I think you get the picture!!! That added quite a lot to the cost of any shoot (i.e. more than double). A photographer can and does keep a much tighter control of those costs and therefore can still get a good return on his or her images if the quality is good.

Don Wieshlow, SVP Products Corbis:

Regardless of the audience for content - premium, mid, micro - there is aneed for all content creators to produce in a cost-efficient manner.

Even before the growth of low-price images, most quality content creatorwere working hard to not have big, expensive productions. There are too many other costs associated with competing that work against over-spending on productions. Nothing has changed in that regard.

Do you agree with what they have say? Please post your replies and get the debate going.

Is it the end for high-end stock photography production?

By: Marianne Winther

POST COMMENT

Gallery Espace presents ‘BROWNation', a solo show by Vishal K. Dar Build Your Very Own Photo Book Quickly And Simply Today 5 Tips For Taking Pictures In The Desert Convert Flip Video To Ipad H.264, Mp4, Play Flip Camera Video On Ipad Surveillance Video Camera How To Purchase An Ip Security Camera Property Protection - Security Cameras Six Advise on How to Take Superior Landscapes Pictures Pros and cons of using security cameras in Public Places Using Security Cameras at Subways Using Security Cameras at Churches and Religious Places Prime Picture Editing Program For Your Individual Needs Image Graphic Formats