It Appears To Be Ironic In My Experience That The 31st Of October 2011 After Months Of Planning, De

Yes Id been sold on the notion

Yes Id been sold on the notion. A government backed initiative in its origins (The feed in tariff!) to save the world from the global impact of CO2 pollution, global warming, a strong policy enabling Britain to catch up with its European counterparts and on a major international scale to give Britain a good foundation for creating good those targets set through the Kyoto agreement.

Understanding the current state of our stagflation impacted economy with an unstable to say the least coalition government I seriously felt after reviewing the progressive and responsible staggered reduction of the feed in tariff in the next few years that the Photovoltaic industry (my primary focus initially) might be a safe and reliable investment. Far from the truth unfortunately if we see things play out as the energy companies would ideally like. Instead we've recently seen the media systematically destroy the actual fabric of the environmental and informed economic argument by outlining a straightforward one dimensional story, Energy company customers without alternative energy generating technology in position (such as Solar PV) are in fact paying the investment returns of people who have by way of the feed in tariff

However, instead of simply taking this story on face value should we not consider promoting the true economic and political agenda which needs nothing more than an elementary knowledge of economics and exactly how big business seeks to manage political policy through its utilisation of the media in order to grasp its origins and ultimate conclusions. This is not even close to a new story but never has there been a greater showcase to stipulate the corruption and lengths people in positions of power and authority go to in order to perpetuate their standing.

Energy companies along with their shareholders have a vested interest in maintaining the current status quo over the energy prices and profit margins. This is a reality (would any shareholder of a major energy company cast a supporting vote for a board of directors that didnt ensure their investment returns were performing well and secured sustainable profits into the future? NO) and it doesnt take a rocket scientist to work out that Ofgem the regulatory body has failed in their ability to obtain a truly competitive energy marketplace. If it had we wouldnt keep seeing the continual levels of price rises we see each and every year.

The fact is, were coping with the truest form of an oligopoly know on the planet that makes regulation virtually impossible and if there's a single person currently scanning this article who actually believes that the senior executives of these very same energy companies dont contact one another at board level so as to set price levels in a self serving interest both for financial benefits and to retain the organisational power structure within the industry then you'll need to stop and think for a moment.

Who does it really profit to strangle the forward march of a realistic competitor to the current energy companies and who are the people who can currently create a stance and switch the marketplace into a truly competitive industry? to be continued

by: richard y Davidson

POST COMMENT

Studying In Uk, Is Now Hassle Free Logistics Company In Johannesburg Offer Logistical Possibilities Supernatural Season 8 Episode 1 Varieties Of Christening Gowns With Which You Can Make Your Little One Special Camping Lights For The Next Adventure Outing Benefits Of Veggies Book Cheap Flights To Karachi For A Treasured Vacation Bathroom Cleaning Before Moving Out The Best Christening Gowns Ensure Complete Cloud Security With Advanced Cloud Initiatives Why Dedicated Email Server Required For Sending Millions Of Mails? Is Your Dead Landscaping Caused By An Underground Water Leak? Act Is Better Than Sat