Maryland Montgomery County Reckless Driving Excessive Speed Motor Vehicle Lawyers Attorneys

ERIC BURLAS v

ERIC BURLAS v. STATE OF MARYLAND

COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND

May 12, 2009, Filed

Following a non-jury trial in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Burlas was convicted of all three offenses.

Issues:

Whether the evidence was insufficient to convict Burlas of manslaughter by motor vehicle?

The Court finds that the circumstances in which that speeds was attained amounts to sufficient evidence to support the trial court's verdict. It is clear that, because of his great speed, Burlas failed to keep his vehicle under control. It is equally clear, from the absence of pre-collision skid marks, that Burlas was unaware of the presence of Myers's vehicle at the intersection where the two collided. The impact of the colliding vehicles, as described by eyewitnesses, was so great that it caused the "cars to be airborne." It may be clearly inferred, moreover, that Burlas failed to keep a sufficient lookout in the operation of his vehicle. The nature of the area in which the collision occurred is also significant. Driving at a speed of 84 to 87 miles per hour on an interstate or other controlled access highway, although illegal, does not necessarily amount to negligence. However, the Burlas and Myers vehicles collided in what is essentially a residential area. While it is true that Georgia Avenue is divided and multi-laned, it is a busy highway in a populated residential area. Indeed, the extensive aerial photographs of the area introduced by the State clearly show that the area to the west of Georgia Avenue is residential, and the area to the east consists of park and recreational facilities. Georgia Avenue and Emory Lane are intersecting roadways intended for both vehicular and pedestrian use. The evidence of Burlas's operation of his vehicle at a greatly excessive speed, under the circumstances that have been described, was sufficient for the trial judge to have found that Burlas acted with a wanton and reckless disregard for human life. Hence, a rational trier of fact could have reasonably found that Burlas was grossly negligent, and the evidence was sufficient to convict him of manslaughter by motor vehicle.

We affirm the judgments of the circuit court.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm's unofficial views of the Justices' opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content

Maryland Montgomery County Reckless Driving Excessive Speed Motor Vehicle Lawyers Attorneys

By: Atchuthan Sriskandarajah

POST COMMENT

A Look At The Most Dazzling Cars In The World How Can I Generate More Sales to My Website For Increased Sales? The Audio Option Explained Cheap Vacations Accountancy Auditing Careers Vehicle Wraps And Also Their Gains Vehicle Wraps: Importance Of Deciding On The Appropriate Organization Vehicle Wraps: Pioneering Marketing Solutions Vehicle Wraps - The Most Desirable Designs In Your Budget Vehicle Wraps - A Unique Method Of Advertising Some Truths About No Money Down Car Loans Strategies on How to Attract Buyers for Used Cars Get Rid From Scars And Wrinkles With Aloe Vera Cream What Are the Best Ways to Get Traffic From Search Engine Optimization Consultant?