Welcome to YLOAN.COM
yloan.com » Medical » Massachusetts Drug Offense Conviction Heroin Confrontation Clause Grounds Lawyers Attorneys
Health Medical Acne Aerobics-Cardio Alternative Anti-Aging Build-Muscle Chronic-Illness Dental-Care Depression Diabetes Disability Exercise Eye-Care Fitness-Equipment Hair-Loss Medicine Meditation Nutrition Obesity Polution Quit-Smoking Sidha Supplements Yeast Infection H1N1 Swine Flu SARS herpes therapy panic surgeon hurts teeth remedies eliminate chiropractic arthritis ingredients syndrome binding anxiety surgery medication psychic dental reflux doctor relief premature emotional stress disorder implants wrinkles vision infection aging liposuction seattle stunning sweating hair treatment tinnitus

Massachusetts Drug Offense Conviction Heroin Confrontation Clause Grounds Lawyers Attorneys

COMMONWEALTH vs

COMMONWEALTH vs. FRANCISCO PIMENTEL.

APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS

October 8, 2009, Argued

February 3, 2010, Decided


A cooperating witness, who was a convicted heroin dealer, made controlled buys of apparent heroin from defendant.

A cooperating witness, who was a convicted heroin dealer, made controlled buys of apparent heroin from defendant.Defendant unsuccessfully objected, on Confrontation Clause grounds, to the admission in evidence of five certificates of drug analysis.

Issues:

Whether the trial court's admission in evidence of drug analysis certificates, in violation of defendant's confrontation rights under U.S. Const. amend. VI, was harmless error?

Observation and Holding:

The word heroin was regularly used in describing the packaged substances obtained in the controlled buys, but at no time did the police or the cooperating witness refer to objective evidence, criteria, or field tests; they also did not articulate how their expertise permitted them to identify the substances as heroin. Finally, the packages obtained in the controlled buys and the certificates of analysis were admitted in evidence together, and the prosecutor in closing argument read the quantities and weights from some of the certificates, essentially relying on them as evidence of trafficking in heroin. We conclude in these circumstances that the certificates provided significant evidence of the nature of the substances as heroin and were the only definitive evidence of the weight of the packages. Because we conclude that the error in their admission was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, the convictions cannot stand.


Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm's unofficial views of the Justices' opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Massachusetts Drug Offense Conviction Heroin Confrontation Clause Grounds Lawyers Attorneys

By: Atchuthan Sriskandarajah
Drug Guide For Acne Treatment Power symbol - ENT Medicals Disposables - Nose Rinsing Device Evonik Medical Resin For Reverse Accessories Supplier "status" The Medical Transcriptionist Boom Internal Medicine Physicians Worried About The Future Cold and Cough Medicines Your Comprehensive Guide To Hiring a Medical Negligence Lawyer NN within the FLD of Medical Nursing An Executive Drug Rehab Program That Takes Proper Care Of Psychological Well Being Of Every Exec? Dentist Traces Dental Problems to Medicines Ayurveda – The science of medicines and medical healing Fundamental Patterns of Traditional Chinese Medicine New Drug on Horizon for Premature Ejaculation
print
www.yloan.com guest:  register | login | search IP(3.129.17.245) / Processed in 0.009277 second(s), 7 queries , Gzip enabled , discuz 5.5 through PHP 8.3.9 , debug code: 26 , 3030, 92,
Massachusetts Drug Offense Conviction Heroin Confrontation Clause Grounds Lawyers Attorneys