Program for Era Transformation
Program for Era Transformation
Program for Era Transformation
For ushering in a new era and neo creation of heavenly situations along with advancement of world humanity's heartfelt sentiments those who are responsible for society's governance and apt management will have to wholesomely control and rejuvenate external systems. In the beautiful designing of society what shall be the government's greatest methodology? Regarding this there is a difference of opinion amongst the world's intelligent social reformers and thinkers. This responsibility must be shouldered by scholars that lead society wherein in the world's contemporary circumstances they must study and research into the above topic.
Well accepted social reforms observe 7 rules viz. usefulness, communism, individualism, anarchism, social relation, idealism and Gandhism. Their followers in order to prove their beliefs and assent by putting forth various proof, logic etc opine that their school of thinking is supreme. Jeremy Bentham gave birth to the view of usefulness. He is respected as a brilliant sociologist. According to him the usefulness of any task or object is dependent on the fact as to how much an individual can draw joy, peace and other such benefits. He says that excess punishment does not improve a criminal and instead deteriorates him/her. The nature of education can throw light on rendering life useful and solve problems of social relationships and living. Bentham opines that political governance must have minimal influence in the social arena. For a country's economic progress an independent professional ethics is supreme. Those who criticize this theory of usefulness argue that capitalism augments as a result of it. Since government control will be miniscule the class of businessmen and professionals use strong arm tactics and oppress the weak. Thus the categorization of rich and poor takes birth. Since punishment is minimal criminals are indirectly encouraged to carry out further misdeeds. Bentham's designing of social neo creation is very unclear and there is a lack of a definite code of conduct. Many thinkers the world over opine that Bentham's precepts are less social and more in principle or theoretical.
The second major ism' is communism. It arose in the form of a revolutionary movement as an opposition to the suppression of farmers and laborers resulting from capitalism. Karl Marx was its founder. The aim of communism is to design a classless society. By ending capitalism national wealth and means after being snatched away from lone owners is kept under the jurisdiction of entire society. By overcoming all financial mismanagement birth is given to a classless society. On the basis of communism we see that the main aim of the state is destruction of individual ownership of land', nationalization of all modes of transport, via law control all finances, destruction of right to property ownership, control of all business and merchandize industry, destruction of all types of individual rights and so on. For such types of arrangements the state will have to re value all tasks. As a result of this no differences are seen in bodily and intellectual tasks and everyone gets things based on potentials and needs. The opinion of humanitarian school of thinking is that the precepts of communism are correct but in order to fulfill its goal by encouraging violent revolutions it is not possible to attain eternal peace and apt national management. Due to this people will harbor hatred, detest, envy, fear and distrust amongst themselves. As a result of a revolution only hard hearted hooligans will survive. It is not certain that the very aim with which a revolution is taken recourse gets fulfilled. In it in fact a very dictatorship like government can usher in. from the condition prevailing today the world over it is clear that wherever communism prevails the situation is quite serious. The results of a violence oriented revolution can be very severe. If due to obstruction of individual freedom the noose of the ruling government is tighter humanity's personal and all round progress gets impeded. Although the basic thinking of communism is correct yet a lot of fear too is attached to its implementation. So many great thinkers of communist countries of the world are aspiring for reformation. By designing apt economic and political management and despite a communism based school of thought oriented around neo creation of external world situations being useful yet in order to advance man's inner personality there is no arrangement noted. It is man who is uses, controls and puts into application external situations and as long as the thinking of man's inner personality remains lowly and tainted till then it is difficult to imagine birth of a society full of civility, culture and discipline. Mere external control and changes can do no good in the long run. Such methods indeed are one sided. In communism there is no place for evolving of the human psyche so that it oozes with greatness, generosity and a personality of high stature. As long as man does not advance his inner nature till then oppression, dictatorship and hoarding will reign.
The 3rd ism' is individualism. Its founder was John Stuart Mills. Also thinkers like Spencer opined that only authority or power reigns supreme. Life, intellect, thinking, experience etc are special human characteristics. On its basis every task of society and a country should be executed. Thus an individual must get the top spot in every field of life. People adhering to individualism opine that a government that rules minimally is best. It is one and only duty of the government to see to it that such an environment is created as a result of which an individual can independently gather collectively and evolve his/her personality, thinking of character and various activities. Individual independence proves to be useful and helpful in progress only when high stature self control reigns over it. In the absence of self control only indiscipline and unruliness benefit. Hence man's inner personality should imbibe high class sentiments as a result of which there is no place for misuse of individual freedom. Until then external political control must exist which will prove beneficial. As per the opinion of a great leader like Gandhiji only a civilized and wise human can optimally use freedom. Hence despite the principle of individualism being ideal and great yet it is not so much meaningfully applicable in daily social living. Without an advanced code of conduct there will be less apt use of individual freedom and more of its misuse.
In those very circumstances in which communism took birth it became the cause of anarchy too. Principles of anarchy were given birth to by Moscow's Prince Kopat Kin and Michael Bukinin. This mode of thinking is called anarchism. As per its belief along with destruction of capitalism via revolution the kingdom too ends. Anarchism instead of having to do anything with mode of reign via anarchist elements has only an interest in establishing a kingdom less regime. As per the opinion of Prince Kin anarchy is that principle of life and behavior within which there exists a society devoid of political governance. The country will be managed via social norms and laws. Man should be rendered so civilized and intelligent that he requires no control of any sort and instead leads life independently. Small committees can very well manage their departments. Quarrels and strife can be solved by a local board.
According to anarchism for every profession, business and other tasks there will be a committee of people chosen by the citizens and will be called communes. People elected in areas of education, production, industries etc will create their own communes. Communes will be totally voluntary and independent. Every commune by choosing various personnel via election will design ethics. All communes will mutually complement each other. All communes of one type from the entire region will create a committee. Thus from local areas will get created regional communes and from the latter national committees will be formed. Thus at the national level tasks distributed by one country will be carried out by respective committees.
Amongst leading modes of rule/governance democracy is highly favored. Its birth has taken place via the principle of social relationships. Amongst its founders are Halls, John Lock and Rousseau. According to rules of social relationships, man in the early stages of evolution lives under the care of management by nature. At that time there was no political rule. As per contemporary times due to problems and lack of comforts, since the need of a kingdom cropped up, its people by electing a king created an understanding of an arrangement amongst themselves. The king after being accepted by the people reigns over them. If the king breaks this agreement and does not nurture his people aptly the latter can overthrow him and elect a new king. Rousseau's democracy took birth based on this precept. As per opinions of social scholars the success of democracy lies with awakening of the lay public and rendering them ethical. As long as the citizens of a country are not alert enough to imbibe social and ethical duties they will misuse individual freedom. The election of rulers of a country and its political leadership is heavily dependent on an awakened public. The ruling government elected will be of the type of citizens voting for it. If from the ethical and intellectual standpoint the stature of the lay public is not high then the elected government will not execute its duties. Thus mismanagement and anarchy will take over. In order to render great the stature of the people immense efforts will have to be made. Further such rulers in the government will have to be elected who have no selfish motives individually, who are honest and great in character. From the economic viewpoint the success of democracy is dependent on the state of decentralization. For this with the help of small-large scale industries, businesses etc the urban and rural areas must be advanced.
Contemporary judicial methods and execution of various tasks within the ruling government take so long to achieve and are so tortuous that for even minor tasks the layman has to be kept waiting for long. So much money is spent that officials take benefits from it. In this a lot of research is required. How should citizens be tax and how to collect the same without anyone misusing it? Democracy benefits us only when its mode of functioning is refreshingly new and that small widespread loopholes are plugged successfully. This is because such loopholes breed unwholesomeness, misbehavior and a society devoid of ethical values.
The one who gave birth to idealism school of thought was the famous philosopher/thinker Plato. According to him man is a political creature. We by being inspired by our self directed desires place belief in the nation. The true nature of a government must be ethical. Its duty is to augment soul progress in its people. The government in order to lead man towards fulfillment creates and manages external worldly changes. As a result people harbor faith in such an idealistic government. Those who follow this school of thought are Hegel, Basana Green, Kant etc. Plato's beliefs are more philosophical and less applicable socially. This mode of governance does not outline a definite methodology and code of conduct. Hence in an ideal based government there is lack of proper direction.
Even Mahatma Gandhi had imagined such a government adhering to ideals. In a gist following are its principles:
The government by looking upon itself as the goal and becoming a medium of advancement of all levels of the public must render its ethics such that its fount lies in non violence based thinking. It must use minimal political authority. It must help its people attain self dependence. The all round progress of village life and its uplifting must be accepted as especially important. Every village must be of the form of a minor government. Not only government authority but that more and more of national wealth and produce must be decentralized but this task must be executed via non violent methods wherein the public is positively transformed both in its thinking and sentiments. For uplifting of backward a poverty stricken people special arrangements must be made. The nation's progress is directly dependent on uplifting and empowerment of its women citizens. Special importance should be given to this. Every citizen must be given education facilities and that instead of limiting education to mere learning of alphabets it must prove beneficial in uplifting the citizen's psyche, soul and body too. On an average every citizen must be provided for leading a useful life. The ethics of large scale industries must be great enough to help proliferate small industries, businesses, factories etc.
The world's intelligent thinkers and social science scholars opine that that for new life in society, the mode of governance should be as above. For the present social methods what truly is the supreme designing for the entire world and further how will it aid human progress? For getting an answer to this deep studies and reforms is the need of the hour. The responsibility to fulfill it lies with the world's leading intelligent analysts. They must research into this so as to unfold the fact that from the above methodologies which is best and most useful for the entire world. As a result of apt conclusions successful research of all pervasive management can be attained which in turn will aid the progress of entire world humanity.
Natural forms like air, water, light, river, ocean, sky, earth, sun and moon is the wealth belonging to all world creatures. It is useful in the same manner for all beings. It cannot belong to any individual or country. Since for entire mankind it is attained specially everyone benefits from its great form. This law is applicable for wealth generated by humans. It is seen that in production a single person gets credit but the reality is that directly or indirectly many others have helped in this achievement. From complete research studies conducted till today it is noted that all this is a result of mutual cooperation and help. In generation of wealth infinite dead or living people have cooperated.
Via a small profession of agriculture the farmer who grows grains does so with the indirect help of so many other people. Right from ancient times many generations via their wisdom based efforts found out about how to till land, use water, sow seeds, harvest crops etc. in the step by step evolution of farming agriculture advanced a lot. As a result of effort and thinking of many people the world over means of agriculture were unearthed. Even today for finding out newer means of farming, many skillful technicians and engineers are making due efforts. For educating them many people are laboring hard like teachers, writers, paper makers, publishers, binders, sellers etc. Thus so many people are associated with the profession of agriculture. Only hence means for apt farming are available. Thus directly or indirectly if help is not there then even an ordinary profession like agriculture will dwindle to naught.
Over and above agriculture for industrial production other professionals and workers are involved. Nothing can be attained by lone efforts of one person. If we cogitate over cooperation then either directly or indirectly, entire world society is bound to one wheel. This law is not applicable to mere individuals only but for the entire world. Materials are transported from one country to another and then to a 3rd country and so on. In every country based on circumstances materials are given weight age. That country which is progressive and wealthy financially the credit does not go only to itself. There exists no country where all articles useful for good living are available. It is only trade and other barter methods which help every country get useful materials.
For the production of all big/small articles we have to take help of other countries. Even highly developed rich nations seek help of others. USA has to depend on other countries to buy petroleum products sugar fruit wool cloth, coffee and electrical articles. Britain imports milk, butter, coffee, sugar, tea, cocoa, tobacco, petroleum, gas, wool, paper etc from other countries. Canada is not self sufficient as far as goods like petrol, iron, steel, coffee, cocoa, tea, vegetables, chemicals, coal and photography accessories are concerned. Japan depends on the rest of the world for fuel, petrol, thread, oil etc. These are but few examples. But if all nations of the world are studied it will be clear that every country is dependent on others for some article or another. Not only goods but even in the arena of science and technology each country takes help from another. Thus world progress is heavily dependent on cooperation.
In reality whatever is produced by any individual, society or country is wealth that belongs to entire world humanity. In production there are many categories. It is unethical to make one sided usage of what is produced. Other people too should accrue these benefits. The arrangement of nature is such that whatever is produced the world over can be easily shared with all world humans. Those who in order to earn more have used their intellect, effort and farsightedness must be aptly praised. By producing this much the producer must be contented. It verily is narrow mindedness that one who earns only uses and thus adds to the disparity within society regarding the rich and poor. On the one hand unwholesome acts like hoarding of wealth, wastage, sense merriment and vices are on the rise. By giving bribes economic based crimes augment. In a certain sense financial disparity is responsible for incapability and crimes. Statistics tell us that capitalism that obstructs democracy gets more weight age and thus crimes increase alarmingly. One example of this is America where human values have no value.
If all people imbibe a life of same financial status then there is no place for envy, hatred, looting etc amongst themselves. Hence it is very important to curb wealth hoarding, monopoly of wealth ownership, rights and callous sense titillation. Excess production must be distributed in society. As a result of wealth disparity many social taints arise which in turn we face violent communist based revolutions. In actuality the birth of communist violent methods that obstruct basic human freedom and that seal an individual's material freedom takes place due to dire financial world circumstances. In those countries where communism blooms their citizens accepted communism as supreme but the reason was that poverty stricken public of communist nations desired revolutionary changes which would ward of financial disparity and inequality. In those very times communism took birth powerfully. Although the financial ethics of communism are useful for society but in order to put into practice their laws revolutionary means are preferred and these in turn are agonizing and obstacles to society's progress.
In ancient times the mode of governance was supremely great. Every individual on an average lived a contented life. After deducting ordinary needs whatever was excess was voluntarily given by the people for good social causes. Those who hoarded wealth faced society's censure. In those days one could never see hoarding as is seen in contemporary times. In fact people competed with each other to donate more and more wealth. Those who were generous to a fault for world welfare tasks were eulogized and respected. Since with reference to hoarding and misuse of wealth there was control that was both ethical and social it was looked down upon by one and all. In this manner if self inspired generosity and self control augment there is no need for external control.
What is required today is that ancient ideals take rebirth. Today's situations demand that equality is established the world over. Thus the disparity of rich and poor will be dissolved. If this is not possible voluntarily then external attacks will have to be endured. When kings, royalty, land owners etc voluntarily did not accept this the government via various laws forced them to hand over excess wealth that was hoarded. Lest they had voluntarily exhibited their generous nature they would have got both credit and honor from society. But alas they had to face insults and censure from all directions. Both wealth and honor were snatched away. In future too such dire situations will have to be faced by the wealthy class of the world.
So what if in democratic countries communism has no place yet everywhere we see praises heaped on financial norms based on communist tenets and further in the nation's economic progress they are found to be useful. In half the world this form of governance is seen. In countries like China, Russia, Romania, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Albania, East Germany, Cuba etc this mode of financial management is at work. In such countries the wall between the rich and poor class has been torn apart wherein every citizen leads a life based on equality. As a result sense merriment based expenditure is obstructed.
On the one hand akin to a cyclonic storm communist ideals are spreading far and wide and in whichever way possible be it violence-non violence, ethical-unethical etc efforts are being made to wipe off financial inequality in the world. On the other hand it is the need of this era that richness gets controlled. Both paths are in front of us. Should we accept communist economic norms which destroy individual freedom and basic rights or else accept those ancient mythology based ideals of our country wherein hoarding excess wealth was a sin. At that time an average citizen donated excess wealth remaining after fulfilling family needs for social well being. As a result society oozed with affection for each other, cooperation and a bond of camaraderie. In fact even if one's life was at stake human values were adhered to strictly. Although rights existed yet people competed as to how much more one executes his/her righteous duties.
Today staring at us are both types of governance and we know the benefits/dangers of each of these. If voluntarily one does not manifest generosity communism will take over along with its harshness intolerable ways of ushering in economic equality. As a result of this its storm like effects will destroy human values. At that time man will work like an inert machine/robot wherein there will be no place for sensitivity, emotions and power of thinking. Due to lack of this its consciousness' all round progress will be throttled. Any sensitive person will not desire that such dire situations usher in world society. Especially people born in India and those living a life of Indian cultural values will never opt for this.
In order that within democracy people harbor sentiments of equality, purity, oneness and soulfulness ancient ideals will have to be reawakened as a result of which heavenly situations on planet earth bloom forth. It is important that for all round progress individual freedom is given limited weight age.
Not only in India but the world over generous economic norms will prove beneficial. In future days the entire world will have get bound to each other with brotherhood and unity. Only then in order to lay down world norms keeping in mind world humanity can we march ahead. Today there is a wall of disparity between rich poor nations everywhere. As per statistics available 30% of the world's population's annual income is Rs 36,000. Included here are all European countries, Russia, Japan, USA etc. further countries having a population of .84 billion people are progressing at a fast pace. Included here are Brazil, Mexico and Taiwan. Their individual income is about Rs 7650. If the speed of progress is maintained thus then in 2000 AD, individual income will become Rs 10,000. After that .75 billion people live in communist nations of Asia. Included here are China, North Korea and Indonesia and their annual income is Rs 2250. 1 billion people are below the poverty line. Their individual income is Rs 900.
For eternal joy/peace in this world the above mentioned differences must be uprooted. Due to increase in tension, agitation and difference of opinion the world over great thinkers and economists are worried. Agreeing regarding this fact they say that the main cause of inequality is the economic situation. This problem is seen to be worldwide. Now it is most required that for the entire world, a single set of economic rules get adhered to. The founder of the institute Washington Institute of Policy Studies', Mr. Richards J Barnett in his book, Lean Purse Politics in the Age of Scarcity' says that the human race will fail to survive its existence if economic inequality persists in the world. The wealth of every country belongs to the entire world. Thus benefits of wealthy nations should be shared with its weak counterparts. He warns that as long as this tradition continues the possibility of a world war looms large.
The world looks upon Ms Vivera as a great thinker and economist. In a small book authored by her called Progress for Small Planet' she opines that one bog cause of world agitation is economic inequality. It is verily an introduction of hard heartedness and inequality that 3/4th of the world humans shell out expenses from the world's 3rd portion of income. On the other hand 1/4th of world humans lap up 2/3rd of it. Even today for 1 billion people of the world there no means like food, clothes, houses, health and education facilities.
The director of Stanford University Food Research Institute' Walter P Calfna opines that in the year 1979 1.3 million children dies due to malnutrition related illnesses. If only wealthy nations of the world had curbed sense merriment oriented expenses they would have been able to ward off such deaths. He opines that if for the entire world generosity based economic reforms do not set in these sort of heart wrenching situations will have to be endured.
Via apt means the right of ethical based production is best not only for an individual or country but for the entire planet earth. If 2 hands earn, 1000 hands must donate. It means that for entire world humanity the righteousness based magnanimous principle of India which encourages mankind to donate excess wealth for world society welfare must be reawakened and imbibed in every corner of the globe. Not only will this glorify one's country but that it will aid a new ethical form of world economic norms. Nature's gift of wealth produced from air, water, sun, space, earth must belong to the entire world and thus utilizing it to uplift world mankind will render this globe heavenly, peaceful and prosperous.
Spread Betting News: Indices within turning point price zone… Square Columns Improve Architectural Impression You Desire King Fahad Causeway – A Marvelous Construction Find everything you need in the Asus EP121 Kingdom Builders : Go For The Best Deal Genital Warts Causes: Do You Know 3 Reasons Causing Genital Warts? Dissertation Proposal Reflection of Thesis Project USA Public Records – The Best Ways Trouser Hangers That Work! HTC Desire Deals Some of the Most Lucrative Offers in the Industry Revitol Stretch Mark Cream - Is it Really Effective? Pet Carriers: Best Way to Carry your Pet Visiting Almería