The Ownership Of Virtual Property

With view to the unexpected accidents like server failures

, the operators don't dare to admit the concept of "the ownership of virtual property". Otherwise, they'll face the biggest nightmare if the online games encounter failures accidentally and players come to claim compensation for their virtual losses.

Theres still no related law in both China and America. Game developers' attitude toward the ownership of virtual property is just: strongly rejective. In the opinion of the analysts from iresearch.com, wow gold game operators will have to face an increasing number of botting and account stealing behaviors, and invest more money to guarantee stably-&-safely running systems, if they accept the virtual trade and the related trade platforms.

In terms of the ownership of virtual property, we turned to the chief adviser from the branch of Sam & Partners: The so-called "ownership of virtual property" only stands for the service contract relationship between world of warcraft gold gamers and game operators. Neither of the two owns the virtual goods actually. The so-called "virtual goods" are just some data saved in one or several computers, not real valuable property.

The virtual equipment's nature won't be changed no matter how much it costs or how many Internet fees the wow gold player has paid to achieve it. In the case that the equipment is missing, the player can just require the game operator to fulfill its obligations according to the service contract, i.e. recovering the equipment, or making compensation for the losses. But this is still not a relief based on the ownership of virtual property.

According to the previous researches, the so-called virtual currency in the banking field is actually electronic currency, which is the inevitable outcome of the new technology revolution and the world of warcraft gold online economic growth. The U.S. Congress once conducted discussion to tax the industry of virtual goods trade.

But since the opinions differed widely, there's no final conclusion made. They thought that the taxation requirements were still far from being satisfied. Some scholars from South Korea once discussed to protect the virtual goods from the prospective of intellectual property rights and endow the goods with real property rights to some extent. But this is just being discussed anyway.

by: amelieS

POST COMMENT

Using A Nyc Moving Company Different Types Of Ownership And Its Importance Office Chairs - An Indispensable Entity Of An Organisation Exclusive homes for sale at Sarasota Tips To Assist You In Getting Home Equity Loan Lowest Rate Repayment Terms Home Equity Loan Comparison: An Overview Of Home Equity Loans How to Save Money When Decorating Your Home Federal Debt Relief - How to Prevent Foreclosure on Your Home Protect our largest investment against all break downs with HMS Home Warranty Bus Shelters: Comfort Traveling at your Door Step Leaking Pipes Or Clogged Drains- Its Time To Call The London Plumbers Outdoor Dining Furniture: Put Your Patio Into Good Use Is Indoor Skin Tanning Really Safe?