Welcome to YLOAN.COM
yloan.com » Artists » Virginia Beach DUI Driving Under Influence 18.2-266 Lawyer
Shopping-and-Product-Reviews Music and Movies Artists Astrology Humanities Humor Language Philosophy Photography Poetry Tattoos Arts-and-Entertainment Singing poker video foreclosure television satellite toys horse belly culture interesting orchid collecting mastery fantastic fashion Casino-Gambling

Virginia Beach DUI Driving Under Influence 18.2-266 Lawyer

Virginia Beach DUI Driving Under Influence 18.2-266 Lawyer


Roberson v. Commonwealth, 689 S.E.2d 706

Defendant argued that his conviction was obtained under and state statute, and thus, the notice of appeal properly named the Commonwealth as the appellee. The Court held that the controlling documents for determining what entity served as the prosecuting authority in a criminal trial are the instrument, that is the summons, warrant, or indictment, under which the charge is brought and the orders of conviction and sentencing that conclude the trial. Proper jurisdictional analysis initially involves a determination whether a timely notice of appeal, a mandatory prerequisite to an appellate court acquiring jurisdiction, adequately identifies the case to be appealed. Any defect in the notice of appeal that does not touch on its timeliness or the identity of the case to be appealed is procedural only. Thus, the failure to identify a necessary appellee in the notice of appeal is subject to being waived by subsequent actions of the unnamed appellee participating on the merits of the appeal if the appellant properly asserts the waiver when an objection is subsequently raised.

While it is true that the order of conviction did not refer to the local ordinance, it is clear from the context in which the case was prosecuted that the reference to Code 18.2-266 in that order identifies that statute as being incorporated into the Virginia Beach City Code by VBCC 21-1, rather than indicating that the case was tried under Code 18.2-266. The record in this case establishes that Roberson was charged and convicted for DUI pursuant to VBCC 21-1. Accordingly, the Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeals did not err in finding that the City, not the Commonwealth, was the prosecuting authority on the DUI charge in the circuit court and, thus, was the necessary party to be identified in Roberson's notice of appeal as the appellee.
Virginia Assault Battery Mob Criminal Street Gang 18.2-42 18.2-46.2 Virginia Malicious Shooting Wounding Display Firearm 18.2-51.1 18.2-53.1 Fairfax Alexandria Virginia Grand Larceny 18.2-95 Sixth Amendment Reckless Driving Speed Virginia Improper Driving 46.2-862 Fairfax County Prince William Loudoun Virginia Reckless Driving Speed Calibration Tests Loudoun County Lynchburg Fredericksburg Virginia Reckless Driving State 46.2-852 Felony Eluding 85 Miles Fairfax County Prince William Loudoun Virginia DUI Punishment 18.2-266 Fairfax County Prince William Loudoun Beach Virginia DUI DWI Implied Consent Ceritificate Analysis Fairfax Richmond Beach Loudoun Prince William DUI Virginia Prince William County Fauquier 18.2-266 18.2-270 Prior Offenses DUI Virginia Beach 18.2-266 Appeal Driving Under Influence Virginia Divorce Spousal Support 20-107.1 Fairfax County Prince William Richmond Beach Loudoun Custom Tattoo Artists From an Artiste to a Revolution - Virtual Album
print
www.yloan.com guest:  register | login | search IP(216.73.216.142) California / Anaheim Processed in 0.016672 second(s), 7 queries , Gzip enabled , discuz 5.5 through PHP 8.3.9 , debug code: 6 , 1989, 117,
Virginia Beach DUI Driving Under Influence 18.2-266 Lawyer Anaheim