Welcome to YLOAN.COM
yloan.com » Internet » Virginia Norfolk Child Pornography Possession In Internet Cache Prosecution
Games Personal-Tech Data Entry registry cruise torrent mac code virus storage uninstaller systems cisco bugs wireless codes maintenance dell update communication trojan atlanta Data Backup Data Storage Data Protection Data Recovery Anti-Virus Windows Linux Software Hardware Mobil-Computing Certification-Tests Computers & Internet Internet

Virginia Norfolk Child Pornography Possession In Internet Cache Prosecution

Virginia Norfolk Child Pornography Possession In Internet Cache Prosecution


Commonwealth of Virginia v. Michael E. Gardner

CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

FACTS:

Defendant made a motion to dismiss pending charges of possession of child pornography in violation of Va. Code Ann. 18.2-374.1:1. Defendant also made a motion to suppress.

ISSUES:

The issue here is whether images of child pornography that were contained in a "temporary internet cache denoted possession'.

DISCUSSION:

At the time the police arrested the defendant they seized his computer. It was subjected to a forensic analysis by Investigator Bowers, who found a number of images of child pornography on it. These images were contained in a "temporary internet cache." the operator of the defendant's computer visited websites that contained images of child pornography, viewed them, but took no further action. The "knowing" possession of child pornography is essential to constitute an offense under this statute. Knowledge is an essential ingredient in the crime of possession of child pornography. Knowledge that a defendant had child pornography on his computer could be shown by the defendant's statements, his knowledge of the operational features of his computer, his general computer sophistication, or other factors. In the present case, the defendant said "I don't have too much" in response to a question about the presence of child pornography on his computer. Based on the statement attributed to the defendant, and other evidences, it is evident that the Defendant knowingly possessed child pornography.

JUDGMENT:

The court denied the motions to dismiss and to suppress.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm's unofficial views of the Justices' opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
How To Download Homebrew For Wii Safely 4.2 Wii Homebrew – Learn How To Download Homebrew To Your Wii Download Web videos from thousands of sites with just One Click with real real player Secure Your Home Network Security 7 Top Internet Business Opportunities For 2011 Send Gifts to India through Indian Florist Network 132-S-815.1 download Wilderness Safaris, The Ultimate Safari Experience Internet Data Entry Jobs Upgraded Network Marketing "The Brutally Honest Approach To It" Give a professional look to your site through XHTML Slicing for XHTML Conversion CSS Web Design – Better Alternative Than Html Code Getting Lawyers is Really very Easy These Days – Thanks to Internet
print
www.yloan.com guest:  register | login | search IP(216.73.216.173) California / Anaheim Processed in 0.016996 second(s), 7 queries , Gzip enabled , discuz 5.5 through PHP 8.3.9 , debug code: 24 , 2000, 49,
Virginia Norfolk Child Pornography Possession In Internet Cache Prosecution Anaheim