What Expert Witnesses Should Know to Minimize the Threats during Cross-Examination Testimony
What Expert Witnesses Should Know to Minimize the Threats during Cross-Examination Testimony
Cross examination by the opposing counsel is the most dangerous time during your testimony. This is when you will feel the most pressure, because you know that the opposing lawyer may challenge your credentials, will try to undermine your opinions, will explore whether you have made any conflicting statements, and will make various efforts to cause you to lose your composure. The attorney may smile but his goal is to destroy your credibility with the jury, the judge, the arbitrator or mediator, and everyone else within earshot.
You have control over many things before trial that will lessen your vulnerability to cross examination. Your CV should accurately reflect everything you have done in your life, and you should be comfortable and familiar with everything in that CV. Only take on cases that are within your sphere of expertise. Any time you venture an opinion or comment about something beyond your strengths, you risk credibility with the jury. attorneys know how to latch on to misstatements, poorly chosen words, and especially statements that go beyond your documented skills, expertise, and knowledge.
When you reach the stage of cross examination in a trial, you have already gone through direct examination. You and your lawyer have had a chance to present the entirety of your work efforts. Your investigations, tests, and analyses should have been thorough and methodical. If you present those facts well during direct examination, you will establish a much more difficult starting position for the opposing lawyer during cross examination.
What you do know, you should answer confidently. What you do not know, admit readily. Your responses need to be clear and concise, direct and precise, objective and fair. If you agree with a question, feel no cost to say so. If you disagree with a cross-examiner's statement, you can also say so, but you should prepare to explain fully the reasons for your disagreement. Between those extremes of agreement and disagreement, you should prepare to qualify any question that attempts to slant the truth toward the other side.
642-446 practice exam 642-481 Study Materials 642-524 Study Materials Cisco 642-533 Exam 642-566 braindump 642-611 exam dumps 642-661 study materials 1Y0-A06 exam preparations 1Y0-456 exam question Mothers: Earn Your Degree at a 2-Year College 642-691 exam dumps 642-731 study materials 642-746 braindumps
www.yloan.com
guest:
register
|
login
|
search
IP(216.73.216.35) California / Anaheim
Processed in 0.016894 second(s), 7 queries
,
Gzip enabled
, discuz 5.5 through PHP 8.3.9 ,
debug code: 8 , 2236, 249,
What Expert Witnesses Should Know to Minimize the Threats during Cross-Examination Testimony Anaheim