subject: Criminal Record Search Results Depends On Search Criteria [print this page] Not too long ago the Wisconsin Supreme Court listened to witnesses' opinions agreeing with and opposing a law that would make expunging court records much easier. Those who oppose the proposed law feel they should have access to any public records on a person. Opponents of this proposal are saying that criminal records searches should tag and show all public criminal records for anyone who has been searched - if there was a conviction or not does not seem to be an issue. It's highly important for the public to be able to understand all sides of a public figure, rather than just certain aspects that are more commonly focused on.
The supporters of this proposal feel that it will help people who have charges against them, but no convictions on their record, to take advantage of opportunities such as jobs, which otherwise might be denied to them. Even though this may not be the regular practice of possible bosses, it's a component of the nature of people to base a few decisions on prior acts. Having the ability to have negative records removed from public records can enable you to get that job you are wanting. This proposed legislation is growing very controversial. The two differing opinions on this one issue can be supported by both logical evidence and empirical data.
There are several reasons that several individuals search public records. If approved, the proposal would make a public records check an unreliable resource. What is missing from the search, people would not know. This might cause distrust and uncertainty amongst the public. A view which the opposition might take is the public's got a right to be aware of it. Proponents feel it may help anyone who is held back by their record. Even if an error was made and charges are dismissed, a criminal record still exists. Employers may draw hasty conclusions that could hurt your future. Determining if specific records should be allowed to get expunged with not as much hardship is something the courts will need to weigh with care. You run the risk of a growing distrust if the transaction goes through. There's a risk of misuse of the data if the proposal doesn't pass. A criminal data search online must stick to the topic and nothing other than public criminal data. Folks deserve to be aware of who they do business with, including details of their public past record. As for another opinion, people have the privilege of privacy. This could the model for changes to happen nationwide.
