subject: iPhone 4 vs. HTC Evo 4G - Comparsion and Review - and the winner is [print this page] I like the iPhone so much, I have been the use of an iPhone for three years now, first the original iPhone then the 3G. When I started hearing good stuff about the Dash's Android telephone, the HTC EVO 4G, I thought hard approximately switching. And despite the fact that I sooner or later made up our minds to upgrade to the iPhone 4, I used to be curious what I used to be missing.
The nice other folks at Dash allow me borrow an EVO for a couple of weeks, and I when compared it to my private iPhone 4. I found that there were a large number of elements where one telephone excelled over the other -- however that, in spite of everything, it used to be hard to make a choice from them. What follows are my observations approximately how the two phones when compared in a number of aspects. In each and every case, I have selected the telephone I think is the winner in each and every category -- while there used to be a winner.
The EVO I tested ran Android OS 2.1, however the following version of Android, version 2.2 or "Froyo," is due any day now. Froyo is a huge upgrade -- however some of the new features are interesting most effective to developers, and others are already to be had at the EVO, including wireless tethering and Flash support. In line with all reports, Froyo plays faster than Android 2.1, however even the use of Android 2.1, I did not in finding performance to be a problem.
Style.
I never believed while comments were published here that stressed out used to be partial against Apple. However this newsletter has showed my doubts.
1) It starts with Praises of Apple - "Apple's new iPhone 4 is the corporate's biggest update yet for the handset and it is going to have you drooling".
2) Has NO symbol of EVO, even though it is a piece of writing for comparison. The Evo looks so much cooler.
3) Calls EVO one in every of a "gaggle of Android devices" at the same time as if truth be told it is the most productive Android tool yet and the ONLY 4G telephone these days in the US.
4) Yes the The iphone is a "snazzily narrow, glass-subsidized slab that boasts a few impressive specifications". No such words for Evo ?
The iPhone is just right however isn't any comparison for Evo. It has a larger display, more open with Android, works on 4G, Multitasks, Can be used as a modem, so much faster. Dash 4G will soon be to be had in all cities.
The iPhone is an attractive little thing -- 4.five x 2.3 x 0.4 in. and weighing 4.8 oz. However even though the telephone is small, it feels forged and at ease in my hand. The glass-and-stainless steel case looks great. The glass is a different reinforced type, referred to as "aluminosilicate." Apple says it is 30 times more difficult than plastic. It sounds awesome. (I think Doctor Who has aluminosilicate glass in the windows of the TARDIS.) At 4.8 x 2.6 x 0.five in. and weighing 6 oz., the EVO is very massive for a phone, however now not freakishly so. It is going to have compatibility for your blouse or pants pocket (unless you wear ultratight 70s disco pants). I have small hands or even so, I found the EVO at ease as well. Still, I prefer the smaller size and layout of the iPhone 4.
But if the iPhone 4 hits retail shelves it is going to need to fight a group of Android devices for consumer attention - the most significant of that is the HTC Evo. The Evo has one large merit that Apple can't beat. It runs on Dash's 4G network, at the same time as the iPhone is stuck on AT&T's 3G service. Dash 4G, even though, isn't to be had in so much top towns, including San Francisco and New York.
If you are taking into account upgrading to the up to date version of the iPhone or getting an Android tool, take a look at how the iPhone 4 and HTC Evo 4G compare: Read More http://www.evo4gforum.com
iPhone 4 vs. HTC Evo 4G - Comparsion and Review - and the winner is
