subject: The U.S. Senate have not pass the Dream Act [print this page] The U.S. Senate have not pass the Dream ActThe U.S. Senate have not pass the Dream Act
Allow illegal immigrants to obtain legal residency of students, "Dream Act", 18, a five-vote margin in the U.S. Senate checkpoints fail. Chinese community in response to the phenomenon of polarization presented in support of the motion expressed disappointment; but because the Chinese community is waiting for a green card there is a lot of legal employment-based immigration, many people would like to see bill does not pass, otherwise they are very unfair. After the failure of the face of the checkpoints, a comeback will be more difficult to infer that the Chinese supporters said it would continue to strive to meet the challenge.
Dream Act ultimately failed in the Senate, was adopted. United States, "Sing Tao Daily," said San Francisco Chinese community for the bill failed to pass, both positive and negative reaction in everyone. Bill did not pass, so some people worry about the future of these young students will have a negative impact if. Also suggested that the Bill can be maintained through the principle of social equity.
Wang Changtai, vice president of the Chinese School Association, said children are innocent, of course, standing in the position of young students want to pass the bill in order to lawfully remain in the United States. However, if passed, will result in more illegal immigration loopholes, resulting in more illegal immigration into the United States to enjoy the resources of the United States, on the principle of fairness to other legal residents of the United States is not fair.
Chinese teachers Pengshu Wan said the bill did not get through to these students may result in a lifetime of negative impact on the United States may also be a certain degree of weight loss. If these students are excellent students can be made of the material, because the DREAM Act failed to pass, the students will give up on themselves? U.S. may lose future contributions to the United States may be talented, but also can be made of wood, a ruined life.
Qiao Jie Xu Yongsheng activists said the bill should take into account the feelings, reason and law perspective, not just from the legal point of consideration, the parties should understand that these students make decisions, such as students living language adaptation. Can only strengthen lobbying Congress for the next round for consideration. Federation of Chinese Schools Kou Wai Fung also believes that as long as the United States contribute to the family, legal means should be legalized so that they, the failure to pass a similar bill hope that the future can be generated and passed.
