subject: Motoring solicitors - avoid those heavy fines [print this page] Motoring solicitors - avoid those heavy fines
Dangerous driving can have fatal consequences, so it's only right that we have rigorous laws in this country to protect the safety of motorists and pedestrians. If found guilty of a motoring offence, the punishments can be severe. Heavy fines or even a prison sentence. However, in some cases there may be legitimate grounds for appeal. A good motoring lawyer can assess your situation and advise if you have a case. If so, then fines can be massively reduced or even waived if your appeal is successful.
One of the most common offences is using a mobile while at the wheel. This law has been in place since 2003, but is something of a grey area. Especially when you consider the number of different uses for modern phones. Offences are often difficult for police to prove. Phones can be used in emergencies for example and they are often mistaken for other devices in motorist's hands. Such as iPods for example. Motoring solicitors can help you establish grounds for appeal.
Huge numbers of UK drivers have received speeding fines generated by speed cameras. Often when only just above the limit. Of course they can help to reduce accidents, but their use can seem a little excessive at times. There are many different types of camera, each governed by its set of rules for usage. The police must adhere strictly to these rules. Failure to do so can invalidate the fine. Consult a motoring lawyer if you feel you have a case. After all, who needs three more points on their licence.
Drink driving appears like a pretty tight open and shut case. Of course, no one would condone drink driving for a minute. The consequences can be fatal. Like speeding, drink driving procedure is governed very strictly. So an initial charge does not always lead to a prosecution as most people would assume.
Motoring solicitors can help anyone who has fallen foul of the law in these areas. This will almost certainly involve using a loophole or technicality as grounds for defence.
