subject: Riposte to interview taken by Natalia Viana with Julian Assange just before his arrest [print this page] Riposte to interview taken by Natalia Viana with Julian Assange just before his arrest
Denying accusations is no big deal, especially when it comes to defend oneself against allegations imposed by the mammoth powers that decide fate of the nations. However, what is important is to raise voice against corruption. Whether it be called white-collar corruption' that despite entailing all the societal immoral values remains ethical just because it capitalizes on the legal loopholes or it fits into blue-collar crime', Wikileaks has given voice to the millions across the globe, who live in fear and die while carrying the burden of violence.
What I have fathomed out is that when Assange talks about the "corrupt American elite" and holds the aim to unveil them, to the extent where they may found guilty, he carries the message of justice to the world. What he does not know is that corruption is not limited to the America alone, though in some cases it may be the progeny of America, but that is not a mere indicator that corrupt elites only belong to America. "Corrupt elites" is the creation of class system, because corruption is probably the utmost elites can do. So, it is interesting to find reasonable clues against those "corrupt elites" that Assange tags as "American".
What he forgets to consider is that corruption does not own a name. It is nameless unless a nation wears it to the utmost extent. In case of blaming "corrupt American elite", Assange must make sure if the whole American nation is corrupt. Obviously it is not possible because had the whole nation been corrupt, it would not have marked as "elites".
