subject: The New Rural Cooperative Medical Treatment Drugs Reimbursed Farmers How To Change The Standard? - [print this page] China's developed areas and less developed regions to several times. If according to the National Bureau of Statistics, in 2008, ranking first in Shanghai, China "rural per capita net income" is the last sort of Gansu, 4.36 times the first. If the two farmers, one in Shanghai and one in Gansu Province are suffering from the same disease, reimbursement of medical expenses can achieve "the maximum reimbursement," but the actual reimbursement of the costs down is a difference of 4.36 times, Shanghai can be reimbursed 60,867.72 yuan, the Gansu is only 13,973.52 yuan.
HC pharmaceutical industry network According to media reports, "Health Ministry official said: the year after next year if the new rural cooperative funding level to 150 yuan, and strive to enable farmers to see the doctor, in particular, could be reimbursed half of the hospital." This reference to the 820 million rural residents, this is definitely good news message. However, we should note, "to reimburse half," saying, apparently with a few days ago, "the maximum reimbursement" provision is different.
I recently had a new rural cooperative's "maximum reimbursement to local farmers per capita net income of more than 6 times" requirement put forward different views, ideas that such a policy seems to be improper. Because according to "per capita net income of farmers", the Chinese developed regions and less developed regions to several times. If according to the National Bureau of Statistics, in 2008, ranking the country first in Shanghai, "rural per capita net income" is the last sort of Gansu, 4.36 times the first. If the two farmers, one in Shanghai and one in Gansu Province are suffering from the same disease, reimbursement Medicine Charges can achieve "the maximum reimbursement," but the actual reimbursement of the costs down but a difference of 4.36 times, Shanghai can be reimbursed 60,867.72 yuan, and Gansu are only 13,973.52 yuan. Just think, when the "essential drugs" are under price control in the country after the Shanghai and Gansu to see if the same disease medical costs also vary so much, I am afraid that is not normal. As the input more or less developed regions and less developed regions is understandable that some differences, but the gap too big to be appropriate. Because of the new rural cooperative's goal should be to "equalization of basic public services," and this is no doubt about the policy of widening the gap again.
Thus, students ask questions to the author, the problem is where? The problem lies in computing "reimbursement ceiling" in the wrong reference, or benchmark. Many of the policies introduced in recent years have the "average annual wage of urban workers," "disposable income of urban residents" or "rural per capita net income" of N times the calculation of view. For example, the "National Compensation Act" provides that "the maximum amount of state employees last year, five times the average wage." Another example: "Road Traffic Safety," provides that "personal injury compensation in accordance with the 'Appellate Court last year where disposable income of urban residents per capita net income of rural residents, or' objective standard to a fixed compensation for two decades the number of years" . Why these rules and the "average wage" and "average income" link then? That is because these damages are the basic living expenses with their associated object, while in contemporary society, obviously can not do without pay basic living expenses and income. Because of this, recently introduced the new farmer's insurance because the insured person and also the basic living expenses in old age related, so payment is also a "county-level administrative region in local per capita income of farmers a year base pay."
However, if we are dealing with policy, thoughts stagnate in the "mindset" on, it will cause a problem. NCMS is not involved in the basic living of farmers, but health care issues, specifically, the result of policy??? "Reimbursement" is directly related to medical expenses. Living expenses and medical expenses the difference is that the former is stable, relatively easy to expectations; the latter is unstable, more unpredictable. Now standard with a static??? "Per capita net income of local farmers for more than 6 times" to deal with a dynamic risk, so unscientific and unreasonable risks to buried.
Health officials call "to reimburse half", as well as a few days ago to reimburse Qi Cheng 2014, which are based on fee-based medicine, this statement should be more popular. Do not know why only in that file has changed. Of course, the "half" or "Qi Cheng" should be able to enjoy a widespread public reimbursement, if by the country's macro data to calculate the "purity", it might have to consider the reasonableness of the.
