subject: Suning strong vested cable charges Ten finalists commercial bribery - Suning, home appliance chain, bribery - HC Network Appliance Industry [print this page] Suning strong vested cable charges Ten finalists commercial bribery - Suning, home appliance chain, bribery - HC Network Appliance Industry
One side
Suning
High-level categorically deny that the other side of bribery is irrefutable facts, who is wrong, speak for themselves! What really happened?
Click here to view all
News Photos
4 14, Trade and Industry Bureau, Zhejiang Province, announced the "Ten cases of commercial bribery." Suning Appliance has long been covered up cases of bribery, suddenly surfaced.
According to information provided by Trade and Industry Bureau, Zhejiang Province, from January 2002 to June 2003, Hangzhou Jacob Electronics Co., Ltd., Xiamen
Of 4,329,166 yuan and 3,179,717 yuan electronics. Period, Suning company to "sponsor fee" and "rebate shall," "
Promotions
Fees "and" venue fee "in the name, James received the company to pay 138,109 yuan, Amoi company to pay 79,600 yuan, a total of 217,709 yuan.
Hangzhou Industrial and Commercial Bureau in this determination, Suning's behavior constitute an acceptance of the fact that commercial bribery.
However, Suning CEO Sun Weimin flatly denies this, and to "There is no final conclusion" as an excuse, accusing the Zhejiang industrial and commercial department announced at this time is irresponsible.
What really happened?
Suning president a liar
According to reports, Suning in the fee revenue to pay the party issued certificate for the "uniform invoice, Zhejiang Province, the sale of goods" and a small amount of "service uniform invoice, Hangzhou, Zhejiang", net
Tax
29,194.82 yuan, the actual income of 188,514.18 yuan, and entered into the company
Finance
"Other business income" subject. May 13, 2004, Hangzhou Industrial and Commercial Administration (hereinafter referred to as "BAIC") charged with Suning "sponsorship fee" and "rebate shall," "promotional fees" and "site fees" and other expenses, are commercial bribery on the grounds that the company made Suning confiscate the illegal gains 18.8514 million yuan, a fine of 100,000 yuan in administrative penalties.
"This matter has dragged on for years." Sun Weimin said, "We have been in court, the first instance so after playing the second instance, the High Court of Appeal upheld the finished Youxiang. Case has not finished, how can be characterized as commercial Bribery? "
According to the people saying
Sun, August 9, 2004 Suning Corporation appeal an administrative penalty, the Beijing Haidian district people's court. Court of First Instance on November 9, 2004 first instance verdict, the maintenance of the Industrial and Commercial Bureau of the administrative penalty decision. Su Ning, the company refused to accept the first instance decision, on November 22, 2004 to appeal to the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court. Suning Hangzhou Intermediate Court rejected the appeal, final decision to maintain the first instance. The Hou Suning to continue to handing out the proceedings.
"From the beginning of negotiations, to the hearing stage, to the proceedings, Suning has been to communicate a positive attitude." Sun Weimin said, "but the Zhejiang industrial and commercial department failed to complete the proceedings on the unilateral declaration of a 'commercial bribery ', as the executive branch to do so is clearly unfair. "
How the business sector in Zhejiang Province have not yet concluded the stage in the dissemination of information?
When the reporter on this confirmation to the Trade and Industry Bureau, Zhejiang Province, the other by the authority's Director Chu clear: "The case certainly have been closed, and Suning accepting the fact that the establishment of commercial bribery." Handling the specific case of Hangzhou Industrial & Commercial Bureau of Inspection Department by people who think that "blatant lie in the high-level Suning, Suning case the court has determined the establishment." while those from Hangzhou Jianggan District People's Court confirmed that the internal staff, "Su Ning, the case has been closed, determine the establishment of commercial bribery! "
