subject: Lang: "entrepreneurs Lack Most Are Thinking" - Lang, Management - Hc Network Appliance [print this page] Of trends: Brand Will be challenged Of trends: Brand Will be challenged
Accelerated internationalization of today, I can not help asking: "we are now
Entrepreneur Thinking to cope with future challenges? "
My speech the theme of this innovation, we may think of science and technology innovation. In fact, we are not in the industrial process, manufacturing and innovative thinking? Such as electronic, capital intensification.
You think that this is our future development? Consider a problem, particularly
Clothing Textile industry, industry of Taiwan? How in the international
Competition Next come to the fore? You will say that low-cost, high quality.
Often heard some of the recent
Clothing The Lord said, Louis? Vuitton has more than 100 years of history, we use now to compete with others, we can only survive in the cracks, by cheap labor.
However, Lang Xianping said, according to this 5-year trend, the world's brands are likely to be challenged.
SONY Technological innovation can be said that the world's top 10, with 2004 spending, for example, its 62% for R & D expenditure, and is used in the most basic research. Results published in 2003 results, its shares in the NYSE declined 30% immediately. So why pay attention to scientific and technological innovation of enterprises falling "almost bankrupt" situation, forcing himself had in 2004 when the restructuring, and a year later officially declared a failure?
Japanese trading companies and trading companies in Korea are not you in mind
Private enterprise , A purely private enterprise development in Asia has no such historical basis. Trading companies in Japan and South Korea's trading company, which no government background.
For example, South Korea Mr. Jin Dazhong, in 1999, had ordered
LG To its Semiconductor Department to sell the modern electronic. If it is not state-owned enterprises, the president How then can the power to order him? Japan is also a financial, not a lack of national science and technology, but it's business, including me just say the SONY, also Nissan,
Mitsubishi After 2000 all have trouble.
"Technological innovation" this goal is not to be challenged, the choice of path will determine the success of our business.
Of strategies: rigid thinking, fate decided
Lang In the forums, "White Strategy": In the past rigid thinking determines the fate of the future.
He said a very interesting phenomenon. Nissan of Japan is almost bankrupt in 1999. This is the first Japanese car companies into the U.S., after several years of operation, the last almost bankruptcy, restructuring of the Japanese it finally failed. When Japanese people know they can not re-own business in 1999, Nissan hired a Frenchman Ghosn as CEO.
Ghosn took office the first thing is to ask all the Nissan into a white paper from today: Because you are wrong about the past, if not wrong, will not fall today, a point.
2005 5 28 , SONY maximum Leadership Who officially gave way, the location to a British. The British in September started its restructuring plan.
You see Nissan, SONY, and even Mitsubishi, have adopted similar strategies. Japanese people believe that money for their half of this semi-state consortia of private enterprises is not a problem, technology has always been one of their strengths.
That the problem appear? Is thinking backward, rigid.
Recently, Korean companies will come up. Lang said that Japan is finally replaced by Korean companies. Chinese enterprises really "before the wolf, the tiger after the middle a group of small rodents."
