subject: Was Not Listed Top Ten High Performance-Price Ratio Actress [print this page] Was Not Listed Top Ten High Performance-Price Ratio Actress
"Forbes" has recently released the list of the most cost-effective actress in 2009, once in the "King Kong", "Eastern Promises," "Mulholland Drive" and the films have excellent performance of Australian actress- Naomi Watts who topped the first place. What has attracted people's attention is that Angelina Jolie has not been nominated to the top ten. In order for film companies to find the female stars with the most potential investment, "Forbes" elected 10 female stars through the comparison of the data analysis, and finally concluded the overall rankings.evening dresses Boots Before Mid-summer Day
After studying 41-year-old Naomi Watts's latest three films, people have found that one can get 44 dollars in return with the investment of 1 dollar in her film. Jennifer Connelly, who starred in "Blood Diamond" and "he is actually not that like you", ranks second. Her rate of return on investment is 41:1.which means one can get 41 dollars in return after investing 1 dollar in her film.The Best After- Sales:NFL hats
The next following is Rachel McAdams who performed remarkable in the movie The Notebook and The Time Traveler's Wife. The rate of return on investment of the upstart woman movie star is 30:1. The fourth place was Natalie Portman, relying on the latest "Star Wars" films and "Another Bolin family's girl," two works, the rate of her investment return reached 28:1.
Old Actress Merrill Streep ranked fifth list. The success of "Mamma Mia" maintain the social status and popularity. One U.S. dollars is invested in her, you can get 27 U.S. dollars at the box office revenue. She was the old and the only actress among the old actresses into the TOP10 . The most cost-effective popular actress access to this year's list were Jennifer Aniston, Halle Berry, Cate Blanchett, Anne Hathaway, Hilary Swank, etc.
The reason why Julie miss the top ten is because her remuneration is the highest. Last year, Jolie`s salary was 27 million-per-movie, this year will keep increasing, and also far more than the other actresses` salary, just 5 million-per-movie, so Jolie will lose involved ROI. "Forbes" indicates that this list is picked from the 100 Hollywood stars and is calculated on he base of the box office of the films , DVD and television pay-per-circulation income .
