subject: Team Building For Little Groups [print this page] Think back to your last team building sessionThink back to your last team building session. There's a very sensible likelihood that step number one was to organise your group into teams. What if you have only a few folks? With six people at least you could, I suppose, opt for 2 groups of 3? However what if you have less still? Maybe when low as three? 2 groups of 1 and a half people goes to cause arguments over who gets cut in half, for sure...
There are three reasons why teams are usually organised into a number of groups at a team building event. Firstly, to form it all nicely manageable for the event providers. Secondly, to encourage everybody to affix in. If you are in an exceedingly team of 20 individuals and 19 of them are outgoing, loud sorts and you're the quiet one, there's a sensible probability you will keep quiet the entire time. At least in an exceedingly team of six you may stand a probability of getting a word in from time to time. Thirdly, as a result of the activity could be a competitive one and you cannot have competition without having more than one team. And most team activities out there are competitive.
Therefore tiny teams want to look beyond the obvious and find a team activity that may not competitive. One that pits the entire team against some kind of challenge instead of one that pits them against themselves. Ideally, the activity chosen ought to additionally be ready to supply feedback on how the team has fared compared with other teams who have already tackled the identical thing. That said, it is less important than simply keeping the few folks as a single team - just like they are in real life at work, of course.
So what does this rule out? Well, all the "usual suspects". Outside pursuits of just about any kind are either individual oriented or need teams. You can have a team bonding session if everybody goes kart racing or quad biking together, but it's not team building - just a shared experience.
Indoor based choices offer you a greater likelihood of finding an activity that everybody can get their teeth into and get some real team development along the way. Being based mostly indoors isn't enough on its own though. The activity desires lots of variety to keep everyone interested and ideally wants to be structured to offer real insights into how the team will improve back in the workplace.
These two elements - selection and development potential - are tough to deliver price effectively for tiny teams and price is always visiting be a difficulty for little groups, that will never be ready to justify the identical kind of absolute pay that a larger team can. I said troublesome, though - not impossible. A supplier's most expensive value in delivering any team event is people. Technology can save the day.
Technologically based team building activities provide variety, full engagement and real learning for groups of all sizes, nonetheless don't need a team of folks to deliver them. That keeps the cost down while not losing any of the benefits. Options even exist that can be run completely online, that means no facilitator - and no facilitator price - desires to be involved at all. And if you are doing go for one that does require a facilitator, at least it won't would like to be a facilitation team. There's nothing worse that the facilitation team numbering more that the participant team!
