subject: Cut a piece of paper locked SARFT closure BTchina Why so? -BTchina, copyright - Printing Industry [print this page] Cut a piece of paper locked SARFT closure BTchina Why so? -BTchina, copyright - Printing Industry
Recently, SARFT for "audio-visual license" a piece of paper stop closure BTchina (BT China Union), attracted a great response to users, most users say that SARFT is too far-fetched. Many tens of thousands of domestic BTchina loyal users, according to incomplete statistics, 90% of users stop seal against the SARFT. Most users believe that SARFT as "interest" off BTchina.
Blind alley
Click here to view all news photos
Excellent friends sing SARFT's reaction was: "Rage to play Sadness BT site licenses, BTChina been closed, will only encourage genuine domestic industry chain on each individual play the best value, not further disheartened, let Advertisement The brand name of the real achieve Network Floor extension of the video industry, so the user will benefit more. Let us look back years later, SARFT this step will be to keep the first step into the industry and prosperity. "BT webmaster Huang Xiwei said: not being re-opened BT website. Yesterday afternoon, BTChina the webmaster Huang Xiwei accepted the ZDNet interview, said he had insisted to the last minute," until the relevant authorities to inform me off, I just closed. "Huangxi Wei said, since the site was shut down, his cell phone and QQ almost been ringing off the hook. Huangxi Wei confirmed in an interview, BTChina was officially received on December 4 off the message, shut down the site that afternoon, The reason is because there is no SARFT issued the "audio-visual services license", which is the record number off the site but not the record number is not providing services, "Although many users are concerned about the site will not be re-opened , when reopened, however, is not the plan now, tired and want to rest. "
BTchina close video performed by "copyright gate" Why close BTchina
SARFT
BTchina stop closures, "a ripple" a lot of friends back: "Unless otherwise there would be no increase in per capita income of money to play genuine genuine," "really is a 2012 coming!!" "Hate only the Chiang Kai-shek then destroy bandit negative. " From this we can see that many users did not understand why the missed Fengting BTchina. SARFT the longer term, in order to purify the Chinese market of copyright protection to intellectual property rights to protect Chinese culture, so that the original authors to benefit from this understandable.
But piracy in China, for "long history", the foundation too, the saying goes "Rome was not built in a day too cold." So you want to clean the copyright of the Chinese market can not be quick success, this will lead to unexpected reactions. BT's suddenly blocked, users start the reaction is "incomprehensible," and then "anger", and angry after that, the ban would not cause too much resistance to delight users? Users of the Internet will reduce the interest?
