subject: Compensation For Corneal Burns Caused By Eye Beauty Thousands Of Consumers - Beauty, Eye Care - [print this page] Eye beauty salon when for products used in corneal burns caused, Miss Jiang to beauty salons to court for compensation. Recently, the Beijing Chaoyang District People's Court sentences the defendant beautiful road to Beijing Aromatherapy Beauty Limited compensation Madame Chiang 394.32 yuan for medical expenses, transportation costs 32 yuan, a loss of cost 630 yuan, a total of 1056.32 yuan.
Plaintiff Madame Chiang said, December 26, 2006 at the beautiful road of the accused Beijing Aromatherapy beauty Beauty Co. handled a preferential card, then on a regular basis to do skin care. April 13, 2007, the plaintiff in the defendant Department to do Eye Care After eye discomfort, corneal burns by checking for the. As the eye injury, the plaintiff was forced to stay in bed for a week at home, while worried about the blind, suffered great mental pressure. Beauty by the defendant to the plaintiff acts causing great economic and spiritual losses, so to prosecute the defendant for compensation for medical expenses 394.32 yuan, transportation costs 32 yuan, a loss of charge 1,050 yuan, 3,000 yuan compensation for moral damage. Beijing accused the beautiful road
Aromatherapy Beauty Co., Ltd. Proxy , Said in court, does not endorse Madame Chiang in the defendant's salon eye care. Agents said that Madame Chiang was originally Aifu Luo customers of beauty salons, beauty salons for my company and Ai Fuluo use the same product, so Ai Fuluo beauty salon closed, part of the customer to do the cosmetic company, which including the plaintiff, Miss Jiang. Our sale of 99 yuan care card should be done in the month, and no eye care project. The plaintiff in the December 26, 2006 to buy the beauty card should be January 25, 2007 finish. After the plaintiff finished, the company destroyed records of their beauty. Because my company did not eye care to the plaintiff, the cornea injury has nothing to do with my company, so do not agree with the plaintiff's claim.
Court has examined: the defendant is non-medical institutions, its business scope includes beauty (except cosmetic-medical). December 26, 2006, plaintiff purchased the defendant sold the 99 yuan beauty preferential card, the card grants the plaintiff 1,000 yuan preferential beauty items. April 14, 2007, plaintiff received treatment in Beijing Tongren, respectively Hospital Civil Aviation General Hospital, was diagnosed as double corneal chemical injury, rest three days and five days respectively, proposed. Total cost of medical expenses for this plaintiff 394.32 yuan, transportation costs 32 yuan, and sick leave due to causes April 16, 2007 to April 20 period of loss of work time lost 1,050 yuan.
Trial, the plaintiff, Miss Jiang made to the court together colleagues from the testimony and beauty beautician Mobile SMS, proved 13 April 2007 Department for beauty care at the defendant, the cleansing products to enter the eye caused by eye injuries. Between the witness and the plaintiff the defendant that a stake in it will not be recognized; and insists that beauty has kept records of the plaintiff, but the end of the plaintiff's beauty care, beauty has been destroyed records.
Court held that: the parties have proposed claim is based on facts or refute other claims based on the fact that the responsibility to provide evidence to that effect. The plaintiff claims its April 13, 2007 in the defendant Department had beauty treatments, and provide witness testimony to our hospital and SMS records, although the defendants have not authorized, but the defendant should be held to their registration signed by the plaintiff Beauty is not provided will record, and the defendant "record has been destroyed beauty" explanation is not consistent with common sense, so the court presumed the plaintiff's claim was successful. The plaintiff when the defendant Department for skin care body caused by injury, the defendant should bear civil liability. The plaintiff requested the defendant to pay his medical expenses, transportation costs and reasonable claim, the court support. The plaintiff requested the defendant to the higher amount of compensation for lost income, the court on its part to support reasonable. The plaintiff requested the defendant to compensation for mental damages section, the lack of Law Basis for the court not support it. It made the decision.
