subject: quot;Because doctors did not room so no ethics" is a paradox - a doctor - the pharmaceutical industries [print this page] quot;Because doctors did not room so no ethics" is a paradox - a doctor - the pharmaceutical industries
March 20, health care reform, an expert on China Center for Economic Research of Beijing University in Guangzhou on Professor Li Ling The new medical reform An entirely new set, hundreds of famous doctors in the province of the political work, she said The new medical reform plan Many problems still exist in reference to, health care reform focuses on how the Government to promote investment into the people welfare. She suggested: first of all with the medical reform to provide affordable housing for health care workers. According to reports, the more often the young doctors to prescribe the more fierce open, because that would like to make money buy a house. (March 21, "Information Times")
"The more young doctors to prescribe the more fierce," Ling experts would seem full sense, but a little analysis, we can easily find reasons to open a large dose of funny was not the slightest technical content.
We all know, the doctors talk about professional ethics and civic conscience, for personal financial gain, you can use a large prescription "patient" it? Their interests must be established to meet the basis of bleeding in patients with it? On second thought, although the income of health care can not be compared with the small number of high income groups, but compared to most ordinary wage earners, it should be and not too little. How much income can be considered paid in place then?
In my opinion, Lee experts attribute the resistance to health care reform health care without lodging, is clearly wrong board. If the medical need of decent housing to reduce the pursuit of profit impulse, then, that poverty caused by the patients need housing support. Calculated in accordance with the logic of expert Lee continues, health care professionals must have room noble medical ethics, medical staff can not speak no room ethics. If the arguments of experts set up Lee, we see the doctor after the doctor must first find out about people without health care have room room, living large rooms or small rooms Caixing. Medical experts such as doctors to change a large dose of defense, would it not funny?
If no room training room staff need to protect medical ethics, then who is going to provide protection to other industries room? Income than other industries do not say health care is low, can not afford a house, to keep basic wages and jobs are quite easy. In fact, current high prices, can not afford a house, the most practical experience should be that low-income groups, rather than medical staff, medical staff if the housing needs should be met, then the housing needs of ordinary people who are going to to do so?
Throughout history, the size of the reform, some people will always touch the interests of medical reform policies to implement the new course will also touch the interests of the minority. I remember the media is a doctor who had organized the discussion of your beneficiaries, the results we all deny that they are beneficiaries. Medical experts now change some resistance to medical reform policy "heartfelt words," so we have to doubt the authenticity of a doctor is not a beneficiary, they may not be the biggest beneficiary, but at least one of them. Not only enjoy the preferential policies for the institutions they enjoy the benefits of the hospital market economy, the implementation of the new medical reform policy Medicine Separation, to help the people, will undoubtedly reduce their vested interests. Perhaps we can do that, get some long accustomed to high wages, accustomed to the commission of doctors, medical reform the current policy so that their high-income shrink, move their cheese for reform, they do not understand, do not support the natural is reasonable in the matter.
Doctor and institutional ethics aside, stick to open a large dose of profit-making, to meet the doctors changed by the hand to the Government to protect the house, while we can say that this phenomenon is the decline of Medical Ethics, the temptation of interest results. On the other hand need to reflect, medical reform policy measures is good, but the absence of ancillary restraint mechanism, medical reform will inevitably become the target Huimin "water", "Jing Zhonghua."
