subject: Not to believe in God: there is nothing more blind than scientists [print this page] Not to believe in God: there is nothing more blind than scientists
Not to believe in God: there is nothing more blind than scientists
scientists, believe in what they see only! how short-sighted?
Scientists, especially professional ones like Stephen Hawking, crippled in body, mind and soul, do not believe in God. Why, theblind They do not believe, either because they are really blind or they need evidence to proof God's existence. They cannot have empirical evidence for they cannot, alas, subject God to their laboratory analysis. In the two cases, they are blind.
They are blind to their own mere presence in the laboratory (for who put them behind their blind machines?)and they are even more blind to the biggest laboratory that they can ever imagine, the universe itself. But they are still blind, for they need proof. They do not see more than their tips of their noses. 'We cannot see God', they reason out scientifically, and hence there is no God. Smashing!
You cannot possibly convince any scientist, no matter how you try, even if he was Einstein and would listen to you, that there must be a God to make the universe. They do not listen to you for they need evidence and evidence subject to verification by all scientists, at all times of the year, summer and winter, not forgetting spring and autumn.
So why waste your tongue for trying to convince a scientist of God's existence, the need of a God and the absolute necessity of a God? Would it matter if a scientist believe in God or not? It does not matter really. A scientist isblind biped, who thinks that has father and mother are apes. He has no proof for such rubbish but what matters, he is a scientists after all. But,the scientistdenies God, however, hepreoccupies himself only with what God has created.
For someone must have done the job. If it is neither you and I nor the blind scientist, then someone or something, did. The universe cannot stand before us alone by itself as auto-createdor created bychance and hazard .
Too much complex for Chaos and coicidence to bring it about and ordains it. It must have been brought about as it is, put together as it is and maintained together as it is.
Scientists with their little head do not need the hypothesis of God( as Laplace who claimed that he did not need such hypothesis for his scientific and mathematical work, but falls short of explaining it) for everything is there to look at, to study, to examine, to analyze and to understand, but they miss out on the most important thing of all how these things came about, their origin, their structure , their function, their form, their shape, their colors.
Atoms had to be invented, and the scientist did not invent them.
They had to be brought together to form and function. They have to have immense powers of energy, gravitation, movement and change to be what they are. But atoms, being the first subject of the clever scientist are not enough to convince him of the existence of God.
Blind scientists! O rather,blind Ignorants! Have no pity for them, for on the day of judgment they shall be dwellers of Hell! And those who support them as well!
