subject: FatCow vs. BlueHost [print this page] FatCow vs. BlueHostFatCow vs. BlueHost
When searching for a reliable web hosting option, 2 names every user stumbles upon are FatCow and BlueHost .not new to the market both enjoy a clean reputation. But choosing the better amongst these two is a very tough task. Various reviews across the web vary in their opinion but a probable winner can be selected by taking into account some of the basic facilities each of them offer.
Customer satisfaction: apart from providing the user with an array of offers what counts most is the follow up. The way the company responds to the queries, the availability of all time support and other company client interactions determine the final reputation of a company not its sale values. Considering all this FatCow is a step ahead than BlueHost with various email, 24x7 customer supports, humane support and facilities .BlueHost has more negative feedbacks on web than FatCow.
Economic consideration: pricing is the first ladder of the staircase of a company's success. A company providing full value for money always wins the game .both FatCow and BlueHost have a minimal difference in their pricing. Both of them provide a free instant setup and both of them have no hidden fee strategies. So choosing a better one on this basis is really not justified.
The package: the services and range of products on offer depends upon the company's manifesto. Some believe in the reliability of simple plans while others fancy lot of toppings to make the package irresistible. The later category includes FatCow. Symbolized by their logo they believe in walking on a new path setting their own standards. You can take your website to a higher level by the email services, mySQL databases and newsletter management options only with slight addition of capital. Disk space, additional bandwidth and scripts can be purchased if a need arises .these marketing strategies are very important for some businesses .BlueHost just provides a simple plan with no add on services. So the choice is governed by your need.
Features: the only sphere where FatCow lags behind is its depravity of multimedia support .the popular cpanel is also not available in FatCow which has its own customized panel. BlueHost is rich in features ranging from PHP ,mySQL and R on R (ruby on rails ) .Moreover you can host unlimited domains , MIME types can be created and FTP service is available for file transfer. Google ad words voucher along with Miva Ad credits and $25 Yahoo credits, are awarded to each customer of BlueHost which helps you put your website on the popularity index right from day one.
Both the companies are in the market for more than 10 years and are well established. The whole pack of information stated clearly states that FatCow is a better option for users who want flexibility while those who want to keep it simple and straight BlueHost emerges as a better choice.
