subject: Is White Hat Linking a Myth? [print this page] Is White Hat Linking a Myth? Is White Hat Linking a Myth?
Last week's Link Whore firestorm truly has me in deep believed, and that'sconstantly painful.
At what stage does a link-building tactic make the leap from appropriate to not? When does bright white hat turn out to be black hat? Or gray hat? Or pink?
And who would be to say what'sappropriate and what isn't? What functions is what'sappropriate, and vice-versa, suitable? It's not your fault weblogremark spam obtainedout of control. It's the other man. If he'd cease link farming so would I. Ok. Certain. I give.
I think the entirebright white hat / black hat link-building and SEM argument clouds the largerlevel. Suitable link developingtacticswill probably bevariousrelyingon theinternet siteyou areseeking links for. This websiterequirements a differentmethod than this one. Your link pursuits need toalways be driven by your information, and yes, I concuroccasionally your content can even be pushed by link opportunities, thoughthat is a slippery slope.
In its most easiest terms: to me white colored hat link constructing means the links you seek outaren'tbeing sought for naturalsearch rank improvement. This doesn'timply you can'tenhance your investigation rank through that strategy, but that it really is a residual effect, icing on the cake, for those who will.
If I can go Miyagi on you for aminute, I'd say "high rank will be the by-product of content judged effectively, then properly linked". But this isn't all. Even non-SEO links may be spam and make the net an uglier location. "Intent" is on the core of yourwhite hat / black hat debate. Why do you would like that link? Answer that queston honestly and you will see why I wrote last week's submit.
The sad downside of the algorithmic link evaluationis always that when mixed with elevatedusergeneratedinformation and links, the intent with the linker can no longer be trusted. So links right now are turning out to be like meta tags 10 many yearsago. Anything goes as lengthybecause itgets me traffic, correct?
Nope. Not for me.
So, both I do not get it, or youdo not. I'll bet on myself, and let's see who ranks for link constructingexpert in severalyears.
