subject: Man did not create God but God created man, the universe and all other human donkeys [print this page] Man did not create God but God created man, the universe and all other human donkeys
Man did not create God but God created man, the universe and all other human donkeys
Some pretend that God has not created man but man has created God. This view declares the total rejection of God and the metaphysical aspect. It rejects also all the possibility to investigate into the intelligible. This view looks into the sensible world in order to understand what is the sensible. It does not depart from the sensible but explains the sensible by the sensible. Here this view accords the idea of materialism with what is discernable.
If we cannot see God then God does not exist. The absence of any proof for God and the impossibility to subject God to labratory investigation and analysis leads the scientist or the materialist not to believe in God. Since there is no need for God's immediate intervention in our observation of the sensible then we can conclude that God does not exist.
Freud is one of those donkeys on two legs. He considers God to be the creation of the immagination of man. A product of human society neorosis that projects the image of a super father who does not exist.
In order to believe in God's existence we need proof or evidence beyond any doubt, if not then the idea of God is rejected. This is what the materialist claims. Science, with all its claims to knowledge and its progress in all directions misses on the most important subject that can ever exist namely the principle cause underlying the existence of the universe, its own creator. But science does not need God as Laplace denied the idea of God as unnecessary for his mathematical findings.
Laplace by answering Napoleon Bonaparte when asked where is God in his work: 'Sire, I don't need this hypothesis for my work', denied completely the necessity of God in mathematics or in sciences. But Laplace forgot that all his scientific work and findings are discoveries of what God has created. Laplace, himself a creature of God who has provided him with a brain but don't know how to use it, is subject to the handiwork of God as well as all his knowledge and his conclusions.
Without an architect almighty creator how can he discover knowldge and forms it into mathematical equations?
Laplace, as a donkey on two legs, forgets that he and his knowledge, he and his mind, he and the universe he onfronts are but all the making of an All Mighty creator, without which Laplace and other humans, whether donkeys or homo sapien sapien, cannot even exist. Where was Laplace and the other human donkey scientists before? Only few years after (for human age is estimated by scientists at 8-9 millions of years ago, a recent phenomenon in the universe?
They were nothing, no human being was in being ten millions of years ago, if not before. The age of the universe is estimated by scientists themselves at 13.3 to 20 billions of years ago. Where was laplace and his colleagues the immenant scietists before?
Maybe they were assisting God in His creation. But Laplace and other human donkeys are
blind to the need of a God for theythey can survive, eat and rink, think anddie. They don't think for one moment that their existence, being made of atoms, has to be created, put and heldtogether and thenshaped into whateversform God has decided. Theyare blind to the fact that they are directly dependant on God for their existence.
But arogance and ignorance of scientists of the reality of their being theydeny the need of the creator that has assmbled their atoms together and gave them all the knowledge they pretend to.
