subject: Is it necessary for them to charges dropped in the "New moon" taping? [print this page] Is it necessary for them to charges dropped in the "New moon" taping?
Charges dropped in 'New Moon' incident. Thing goes like this:
Tumpach was arrested Nov. 28 in the Chicago suburb of Rosemont and faced a felony charge of illegally copying the film. Some people think that it's important to note from earlier articles that Muvico was pushing the prosecution and was the one that initially called the police. The video was reviewed at the scene and even though it was clearly not an attempt at piracy, Muvico still insisted that she was arrested. God knows what happened. We do not want this kind of news show up on the internet and we hate the entertainment company released to the public.
How ridiculous that charges were even brought up in the first place, we want know what exactly in their mind. People would be amazed at how our prisons are bulging with nonsensical charges. Even some People call for boycott on this theatre, so they will never get any of others money! Things become more and more serious. Many people could not understand what happened. It is just like you find a nice and cheap wedding dress in the on-line shop which called Dressinwedding.com. And then you happened to see lots of people's review about Dressinwedding.com (www.Dressinwedding.com ). This kind of comments will surely influence others. If those comments are positive, it will benefit the Dressinwedding.com a lot. Otherwise, they will destroy the on-line shopping interests. Let's pray for those inculpable people.
Fortunately, Charges have been dropped against this 22-year-old Chicago woman. Cook County prosecutors on Friday announced in court that they won't pursue charges against Samantha Tumpach. This woman had about three minutes of "New Moon" on her digital camera. Tumpach has said she was taping her sister's birthday party and wasn't trying to record the movie. The film's director, Chris Weitz, came to Tumpach's defense. He told the Chicago Sun-Times there's a difference between trying to protect a copyright and prosecuting someone who didn't mean to commit video piracy.
This thing never should have started in the first place, of course. When did we start paying taxes to finance storm troopers for the movie/music industry? The studio's cave is obviously meant to cover their asses from the civil suit she threatened. I hope she goes through with it anyhow, and includes our useless prosecutors.
Cook County Prosecutor Anita Alvarez was clearly a big mistake all around. Most people may hope voters rectify that in the next election if not sooner.
