subject: 3 Content Management Systems in Brief - WordPress, Joomla and Drupal [print this page] 3 Content Management Systems in Brief - WordPress, Joomla and Drupal
Visit a webmaster forum on the Internet and raise, "What is the simplest content management system on behalf of me to use for my site?" Differences of opinion can sprout faster than crabgrass during a front yard. Following are 3 brief reviews of what are arguably the most widespread free and open-source content management systems available on the Net -- WordPress, Joomla and Drupal. These briefs are the opinions of a webmaster who has designed and maintained sites on all 3 systems. WordPress Execs: Anyone venturing into building a Web website on a CMS for the primary time ought to contemplate WordPress as a strong choice. It is simple, intuitive, simple to use and simple to install. Templates and plugins are readily available on WordPress.org and straightforward to install as well. This system is right for somebody with lightweight technical skills. Cons: Being one amongst the only systems conjointly makes it one amongst the most restricted systems. As sites grow, they need additional options and functionality. WordPress is essentially referred to as software ideally used for blogging; something beyond blogging requires something a lot of sophisticated. The community forums at WordPress.org are moderately useful for brand new and inexperienced users. Joomla Pros: Joomla is meant for the masses, simply like WordPress. It is extraordinarily in style in part as a result of it has a nice visual interface that creates it easier to use than alternative systems. The community forums at Joomla.org are extremely active and helpful for brand spanking new users. The site also has an intensive variety of accessible plugins, that are simple to install. Joomla is best suited to someone with moderate technical skills. Cons: The quantity of plugins is weakened by the standard of plugins. Not all of the plugins integrate effectively and should be discarded. The HTML editing interface is quirky at best. Security additionally is a problem; the community forums tend to point out a high variety of hacking issues on member sites. Like WordPress, the software is limited in what it can do with the layout and presentation of pages. Drupal Professionals: By way, Drupal is the foremost technically advanced of the three systems. It is highly revered for its tightly designed architecture, speed and effectiveness. Security clearly may be a high concern. Layout and presentation are less restricted than WordPress or Joomla. Thence, Drupal may be a CMS that appeals to webmasters with strong technical skills. Cons: The interface is the least intuitive of the 3 systems. Drupal is well-known for having "a steep uphill learning curve," a quote that has appeared often in discussions regarding its strong points and weak points. Additionally, the forums are the smallest amount useful of the three systems if the post comes from a replacement and inexperienced user with weak to moderate technical skills.
