subject: VoIP pioneer that pulled out of sadness policy threshold - Internet phone, the policy threshold - Co [print this page] VoIP pioneer that pulled out of sadness policy threshold - Internet phone, the policy threshold - Co
The gray status has been a pioneer began to retreat. Experts believe that short-term rise of Internet telephony is difficult. VoIP pioneer escape Li Jie is now very much regret this business VoIP chosen as less than a year, the company has faced more than 90 million deficit and is known as "China's Internet Phone The first case" of lawsuits. 2006 2 months, Li Jie established wide network of Beijing in northern China Technology Limited to one time payment of 50,400 yuan to buy the 600,000 minutes Internet phone bill, they become Founder Broadband Internet phone services first national Proxy Business. Li Jie has used Internet telephony, voice that worked well, Hua Fei is also low, and the Founder of this brand also gave her confidence. But in March 2006, when the first batch of products issued to the subordinate agents 10, the Jie have received the "products can not use" feedback, Founder broadband phone CTT Network can barely use, and in Netcom And China Telecommunications Can not the basic network. Jie broadband connection to Founder " Business Fraud "as an excuse, be brought to the Haidian District People's Court. The court under Ministry of Information Industry of the red-headed letter made it clear that:" the "PRC Telecommunications Regulations," Article VII and Article IX, business networks and telephone services need to obtain Basic Telecommunications Business license. The launch VoIP Broadband Founder Service Does not apply, nor receive the appropriate basic telecommunications business license. "At this point, Li Jie and Founder is not a dispute between the focus of this conclusion in fact the domestic large and small VoIP operators pushed to the edge of the cliff. Not stand the endless waiting for a number of companies have fled the Internet phone. UK phone operator IPhox emerging network into 80 million yuan in 2006 China Football Super League title, thereby opening its doors to enter the Chinese VoIP market. However, no loosening of the policy, so IPhox not received anything in return. Finally in November 2006, IPhox abandon the original five-year 400 million yuan Investment Super plan, leaving the direction of this piece of blind areas. Why was blocking VoIP In fact, Li Jie in the invested specifically consulted before VoIP Telecom Ministry of Information Industry Management Council staff, was told that "VoIP is not illegal." What is illegal? Industry analysis, network phone itself is a low-cost voice, data transfer tool, is not illegal; business Internet phone equipment is not illegal, AVAYA from foreign to domestic Huawei , Century Netcom, fire equipment are sold. Really is the business illegal. In 2005, the Ministry of Information Industry to over Communicate Authority and the operator has issued 413 "notice", in addition to China Telecom and China Netcom in some parts of the network telephone business test, no unit or individual shall not engage in the business. Therefore, the best VoIP operators now do not touch the bottom line of this policy. For the time being, slower growth Analysys International said in its analysis report, VoIP, slower growth will be temporary. No carrier-grade NGN network, VoIP is difficult to become a mainstream means of communication. Analysis according to Analysys International, in 2006, such as open Internet phone services, mobile and VoIP from the competition will make fixed-line operator cash flow deterioration, inability to build 3G. Therefore, in the fixed network operators are 3G license Before the policy can not open Internet phone, VoIP strict control management approach does not come loose, semi-underground network of phone operators will not exceed the size of the 2005 level. Analysys International predicts that in 2008, 3G network construction ended, fixed circuit Switching equipment Further depreciation, fixed charges reduced conditions, reduce the tariff difference with VoIP, which would be no need to limit price competition in the telephone network. [Key words]: VoIP Policy threshold Comment Large In Small
