subject: Tubal Reversal Surgery Than In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) [print this page] Tubal Reversal Surgery Than In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
Which method is better than the return of fertility? Whether or not tubal reversal or IVF is of better quality must be based on individual factors and balance. IVF is an unconventional method and consists of administering daily injections of fertility. The patient's response followed a period of 2-4 weeks, with frequent visits for management purposes. At the appropriate time, eggs are harvested from the woman by placing a needle through the vagina into the ovary. This process drains follicular fluid in the ovaries. On the day of egg retrieval, sperm, combined with the patient's eggs and embryos are produced. The range of the fertilized egg (now a fetus) is followed on stage for several days. The embryos are transferred to the uterus of the patient by inserting a small tube through the cervix into the uterus. Some of the reasons to make the option less desirable Tubal Reversal IVF are: * In general, one to four embryos are transferred, depending on the patient's age. The success rate of pregnancy is highly variable and may result in multiple attempts. When couples are infertile, who want the process should return, which is expensive * IVF has a higher risk of multiple pregnancies that Tubal reversal * Some couples can not have the time or want to make multiple visits to the clinic, which are required for IVF and tubal reversal not * Many of the steps in IVF are unpleasant. Many people must be convinced that the procedure may act as "this time" unlike Tubal Reversal which includes a single procedure * The risk of over-stimulation of the ovaries is much larger than for tubal reversal, and can be very serious (ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome - SHO). Tubal reversal is best for people who want to conceive naturally with a conventional procedure. What are the disadvantages of having a tubal reversal, rather than in vitro fertilization? * Tubal Reversal enables the design of multiple pregnancies. This is a disadvantage for those who want just one child. This requires future contraception. * All pregnant after Tubal Reversal should be monitored at the beginning of an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy Comparison between the success rate of IVF and Tubal Reversal: * It is the success rate of 20-35% per IVF. * We found the pregnancy rate of 66% over time, inverting the tubes. IVF is the best option for patients in whom tubal reversal is not possible, or in patients who are not good candidates for tubal reversal. Many patients have other factors responsible for infertility, such as diminished ovarian reserve (may be evidenced by an increase in follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) value), blocked fallopian tubes, advanced age, other medical conditions, severely abnormal sperm or tubal reversal procedure less than optimal IVF. In addition, some tubal reanastomosis removing the fallopian tube, and therefore a tubal reversal is less likely to succeed.
