subject: Questions Of Training - Is A Professor Of Ownership A Good Idea? [print this page] Questions Of Training - Is A Professor Of Ownership A Good Idea?
Education is a very difficult subject. It is clear that maintaining a high level of education is absolutely essential for any company that wants to grow and grow. But to spend too many resources in the wrong place to try to keep up high standards can waste time and money and leave you worse than you were at the beginning. In addition, just to spend time and money, but it is in your budget can be a problem if the steps you take are not effective - in other words, policies to facilitate the process of maintaining effective teachers focused and productive can backfire if they end up being too heavy.
On the other hand, too much "hands-free" approach can create opportunities for teachers and professors should be lazy and ineffective without the threat of review or assessment. This brings us to the main topic of this article - the role of teachers and professors. Possession is in large measure of job protection for teachers and professors who have attained a certain position in their institutions. It is usually reserved for more experienced workers who have proven adequate for research and performance. In short, the granting of tenure is almost impossible to fire tenured professor.
There are several reasons for the granting of tenure is logical. On the one hand, it allows schools to save money by paying the salary of a little less for teachers than it otherwise - most people are happy to negotiate a part of ensuring that wages are not losing their jobs. Moreover - and this is the most common reason for holding said - it creates a situation in which a teacher who happened to be responsible may continue its investigation and criticism without fear of professional reprisals.
Basically, teachers do not have to worry about losing their jobs because someone in charge is at odds with his work, or is irrelevant. This provides the intellectual freedom to pursue all educational research as it considers appropriate. Without tenure, teachers may feel compelled to pursue academic goals that were less agree with the things that the teacher is intellectually important and more in line with the financial goals of the university, he worked for.
potential drawback is that possession is in the hands of officials of the university professor, whose performance is declining. E 'is entirely possible to create a situation where the teacher is a valuable part of the University for many years to go through some sort of internal crisis, or simply tired, or indifferent, and as a result left his job well. Then the university has to deal with a professor who does not do what he must do to teach students, but can not fire because he has an official report. This creates a drain of taxpayers and the university, and harms the students must take lessons from someone who is not "all there".
Like many problems in education, seniority is a sensitive issue. There are people with passionate arguments on both sides of the argument - firstly, it is important to provide effective job security of teachers and academic freedom. On the other hand it is also important to have a system where under-achievement of the faculty can simply fly under the radar. The best answer is probably a combination of both - a tenure system rock solid for faculty quality with some type of safety nets and emergency services that universities can not be invoked in extreme cases a employee with less than ideal.
