subject: Science collapses at the big bang: Does this indicate a meaning? [print this page] Science collapses at the big bang: Does this indicate a meaning?
Science collapses at the big bang: Does this indicate a meaning?
All scientific theories and hypothesis collapse at the big bang singularity at zero point. Theory of relativity, quantum theory and the Master theory, all stop at the frontiers of the big bang. No knowledge whosoever is proclaimed by any scientist nor philosopher. The big bang wall where the Max Planck wall is identified being the shortest distance possible in matter, all perish and seize to apply before such zero point.
But what is behind the zero point and what is behind the wall of Planck? No one has been there and returned to tell us what he saw.
Our knowledge stops at these frontiers. What was knowledge before? Your guess is a good as mine!
No one was there to tell, except for God.
If our universe at zero point was non-existent, some twenty billions of years ago, where all had started, then what was before it? This question maybe contradiction in terms, or even an argument in a circle. What existed before existence? We identify existence in terms of matter and time. It is a time dimension in matter.
At the time being, no one claims to know what matter is, where did it come from, why should it be and what is its finality? Unless you do!
If time is a ray of matter, then we are left with the enigmatic presence of matter impinging on our presence like a hawk.
Matter and time remain absolute enigmas. No one definition is advanced by any scientist.
Does this mean we are on our own and the question is left open as it really is? This leads immediately to an origin. Here, we are at the threshold of the unknown.
Point zero of our universe leads us to conjecture with no limits. Was there a God who has initiated all? Is there a God who has initiated the universe, fashioned it and controlled it as it is? These questions are metaphysic in nature. Metaphysics remains the only resort at this point. Metaphysical philosophy becomes then the speculation into the universe before the universe, and whether it needs a God to make it or auto-made.
The big bang in opposition to the eternity of the world resolves the question partially, but if the world is eternal and has no beginning nor end. then this does not nullify the need of an eternal God who made an eternal universe, since things cannot be by itself.
The big bang indicates a creator force, and aslo the etrenity of the world. We, as human beings, very newly introduced tino this universe, have the choice to believe or disbelieve in this God. But the point zero, if we accept the singularity, impinges on our minds the question of a meaning.
