subject: The Revival Chance of Flight of the Phoenix That Crushed by Drikold of Mars Is Slim [print this page] The Revival Chance of Flight of the Phoenix That Crushed by Drikold of Mars Is Slim
Coetzee had once said in the interview: "I do not know that whether being a human has constituted as a proud position, when people see how arrogant we treat other creatures who share the earth with us. So, I do not try to support or spread my human. [When Coetzee said this, he seems like the distant relatives of human, calm and indifferent. In today's era which literatures can even noisy show, he might be one of the most incompatible writers, since he continued to avoid the media, the crowd and refused to reputation. This awareness which is distant with the world and prejudice is also reflected in his literary commentary. "Strangers in the country" has collected 26 literary criticisms published in the 1986-1999, "New York Book Review" by JM Coetzee. Topics covered literature and society, history, politics, culture and the history of writers, discussing objects including 26 persons such as Defoe, Rilke, Eliot, Kafka, Musil, Brodsky, etc., clearly presenting all literary points of view and value position of Coetzee.Pulse Oximeter , Most Optimum Choice for Hotties
Generally, literary criticisms of writers are all very re-readable, or extremely forceful as Kundera, or wisdom and flexible as Calvino, or sharply penetrating as Nabokov, but most of them emphasis on emotion and experience. However, Coetzee with rigorous academic training and the background of social history of ideas not only is good at putting his perceptual experience into the narrative, but also holds sharp and straightforward point of view and attitude, which will never take moderation. In the article of "What is the classic, his capacity for critical thought is the most visible. Eliot made a presentation entitled "What is the classic" during World War II in 1944. Coetzee questioned his lecture why "made no mention of his American identity, even didn't mention his own American origin, but just with a lot of strange perspective praised a European poet to a bunch of European audience", after then used social and cultural analysis.The Best After- Sales:Infrared Thermometer
Combined the literary history of Eliot, sharply criticized him "By defining the so-called ethnic or national character, using all his accumulated cultural power to impose their definition on the nation to the intelligentsia, to influence the public opinions" in order to achieve Eliot`s personal dedication and initiative. Whos Most Good-Looking of Them All? Blood Pressure Monitor ! Then, Coetzee took the down and unknown of Bach`s lifetime and his reputation after his death, detailed analyses the "classic" Evolution process and its relationship with the critics. He borrows the Polish poet Herbert`s view that the so-called classic is something that can be able to survive brutal experiences. The reason why it is like this is because generations of people really love it and protect it. Any criticism of the classic is not only can not destroy the classic, on the contrary it is they that eliminates the less important through continuous rigorous challenge to name the real classics.
In other words, criticism is the indispensable fellow to the works that would like to be a classic. Coetzee`s comments give up the [sympathetic understanding" and pick out the complicated imbroglio between literature and reality through the methods of sociology. The biggest challenge of literary criticism is not accurately pointing out the merits of works, but how you say your words calmly facing and whether you dare to be the stranger of the literary history facing the superimposed layers of history of literary comments. This requires not only knowledge, but also courage. A deep understanding of the life history of the writers is another major superiority of Coetzee. We often say that Reflection of Life, which means that only fully understand the value of life experience and position, can we truly value the unique insight into the work, and all the precise literary criticism are all built on this. The part that Coetzee talks about his beloved Dostoevsky in his book is absolutely an exquisite interpretation. He told us that Dostoyevsky is very xenophobic and has a "boundless hatred" to the Germans, blames the old Florence man`s singing in the streets when he was sleeping, and offensive Swiss not fix the double glazing, so he always held a grudge to Turgenev who was getting along well with people in foreign countries.
And even Crime and Punishment got great good remarks, successful publishement of Idiot, Fyodor Dostoevsky still felt sad for his inferior to Ivan Turgenev and Tolstoy, envying their assets and leisureness, which is an imporyant mental motive of stimulating Fyodor Dostoevsky to write. Literary theories of Coetzee lasted status of strangers, alerting any bias and binding of ideology, such as his conducts, which are far away from external world. Intentionally or unintentionally, this attitude is back to one of the basic meaning of literature. The true literary first teaches man to keep distance with the world, and man does not want to be too close with the world, because any attempt of work and practice to embrace the world, from the essence to say, which is a course of gradual loss of "I", and can only become "social animals" Brodsky stresses.
