subject: 55% Fiscal Reduction On Energy Requalification, The Data [print this page] Some days ago ENEA has released the first data regarding the report 55% fiscal reductions for the energy requalification of the building heritage existing in 2010.
The National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and the Economic Sustainable Development (ENEA) has indeed released that in 2010 it collected 405.600 paperwork for a total of 4.6 billions of Euros invested to empower the energy efficiency in the field of constructions, with an average expense for each installation of 11.350 and a respected energy average saving of 5 MWh/year for each installation. As for the kind of intervention for which people have asked the 55% reduction, at the first place there are shutters: most of paperwork received by ENEA in 2010 regarded the replacement of external doors and windows (main doors, balconies etc.) for an amount of 220.000 interventions on a total of just more than 405.000.
The choice seems to have been motivated, apart from the primary will to reduce energy costs, that is the necessity to install doors and windows able to isolate better the internal spaces from the outside, even by the will to have a more reliable anti-intrusion shutters, in order to have the possibility to leave the house without fearing that someone could enter without permission, as sometimes solid doors and windows can discourage criminals, as an anti-intrusion alarm.
Going back to the environmental point of view, the 55% intervention realized in 2010 guaranteed a global energy saving higher than 2.000 GWh of primary energy per year, for a reduction of CO2 emissions in the atmosphere of 430.000 ton per year.
At the second place among the 55% reduction interventions realized, stands out the replacement of the winter air conditioning, with more than 125.000 paperwork, that is 31% of the total; in third position there are the installations of solar panels for the production of sanitary hot water with almost 50.000 practices that is 12% of the total.
At the national level the distribution on the territory has been rather patchy, if you consider that four regions of the North of Italy have 60% of the interventions: first the Lombardy with 21.7%, second Veneto (13.7%), Piedmont (12.9%) and Emilia-Romagna (11.7%). From a comparison between the intervention and the number of inhabitants of each Region, has emerged that the most spendthrift Region is Trentino-Alto Adige which in 2010 has presented one practice every 71 habitants, while in Friuli-Venezia Giulia there was one every 72, in Piedmont one every 80. Definitely less the intervention realized in Campania (one 55% reduction practice every 670), Calabria (one every 611) and Sicily (one every 600).
The desire of reducing the vertiginous costs of electricity, gas and water consumption, may have a sudden stop, because of the suspension of the 55% fiscal reduction from 2012; indeed 94% of the interventions has been made by natural persons that probably without the 55% reductions couldnt afford the total cost of the interventions for the energy requalification of their houses.
