subject: Ayodhya verdict: Ratification to massive parliamentary political violence against Indian Muslim and other minorities in India [print this page] Ayodhya verdict: Ratification to massive parliamentary political violence against Indian Muslim and other minorities in India. The judgment over the demolished site at ayodhya is out of everyone's reach of the thinking without its level to gauge of its height and it contained its own level like a piece of a mirror in the hands of all people to see the image of the own who carry it in the hands irrespective of its own nature to define for its definite conclusion about it in understanding firstly without going into its 8,189 pages. So that this (special kind of) judgment only can satisfy the majority of the people in the world about its mixed nature of the Indian democracy, secularism, capitalism, terrorism and right wing fundamentalism in India since the day of the demolition of the babri-masjid on 6th December, 1992. We all are witness on the day scenes and leadership role of the sangh parivar backed rath yathra at the demolition site. Many facts in razing down the structure directly and indirectly involved and reaped its fruits from the power at centre for almost all the period including the traitor's reign, including the period of atal Bihari vaj payee that is more than eleven years. Keeping in view of its complex nature, I see it for some limited areas only which contain the past and possible future complications on the Muslim monuments, assets, and properties in India. No doubt, I say it is acceptable for all Indian Muslims. At the same time it is also not acceptable for all Indian Muslims, because in India the Hindu fundamentalists are carrying a flag of Hindu religion in one hand in the name of political agenda as a parliamentary political party to misuse their political power through the mighty force of military, paramilitary and defense forces against the Indian Muslims who in turn did not have a single reliable political party. So that the Indian Muslims are the political orphans what the conditions forced to feel since the day of the demolition of the babri masjid. The practice mix of politics with the religion for political power was desisted in Europe, England and in United States, very long back of 500-600 years in the history. Now in these days since the date of demolition to calculate their mental ability to follow the way for the best of Indian state with a loss of one limb to their handy capped body religious ideology on the name of nationalism to the present date. In coming elections, this verdict would be tagged to the list of their (failures) successful claims in their reign of terror in all most all the years. If they are really the intelligent enemies of Indian Muslims, then every Muslim would adjust with their ideology and practice of good in resuming the raja dharma towards Indian Muslims along with the other Indian citizen. Even then too they never agree. If all the Indian Muslims asks them to accept the Muslims into their religion of Hinduism, even then too they never accept as to convert into their fold on the condition to provide the, food, shelter, health, education, peace and security, to all Indian Muslims along with the other citizens in India. Even they would never be able to assure the Indians for communal free India. If they assure the Indian Muslims for not playing the communal and religious card in elections, for just for 10 years, the Indian Muslims would definitely think about their promises to achieve the peace and harmony in the Indian society. I am sure even then too that they would never be able to stick to any of their promises they makes to the people during and after elections. In essence, these Hindu fundamentalists backed parliamentary political party should be cancelled from the recognisation as a political party by the election commission of India. If it found difficult in banning the BJP, the VHP and RSS must be banned in the interest of the peace and progress of the nations. The senior bjp leader has stated on the verdict that those will go to the Supreme Court; they would be anti-national. It is correct way finding the weakness of the verdict what he thought about the validity of the verdict, if challenged in the Supreme Court, the result is expected as he sees its failure there in future. The Liberhan commission, which had inquired the facts and occurrences under its terms of reference in leading and involving the political parties and its leaders in demolition of the babri masjid, submitted its report to the government of India, and no action has been initiated against the list of criminals who have been found guilty for the act of demolition of the disputed site, babri-masjid. The verdict on the site at ayodhya does not have any approval to the act of demolition of the babri masjid in the fair language of the Indian judiciary but the judiciary always turns a tool in the hands of the language of the politics of right wing Hindu fundamentalists who have already stated claiming that their claim over the site of babri masjid was right and ratified by the high court. So the Indian Muslims like the other people in the sense of religion have three kinds of people. Of them one kind is belonged to the extreme category which claim of the Islamic way of solution to the problem of present verdict, by constructing the same babri masjid in the same place as it was once constructed and continued to exist as masjid till the date of fraudulent installation of lord (sri) ram's idols inside the doom in 1949. The second category of the Muslim people is to compromise with each other for the welfare of peace of harmony in Indian society and they see the development of the state, Muslim community and themselves also in one and in same spirit like others in Indian society. In other words they could be called moderate Muslim category. The third is the complete poor and downtrodden class of Muslim community which always engaged in daily earning sources only. They do not have capacity of bearing the next day without work. These people have little knowledge, interest and reach to the subjects of Islamic issues and depended upon the teaching of the imams in masjids through Friday sermons in India particularly. On verdict of the high court, the majority of the Muslim people who are looked satisfied mostly and can say the majority of the Muslims saw this judgment day passed without any incidents against the Muslims in any part of India. The mind in analyzing the nature of the verdict is seen more satisfying over the peace and security arrangements than the content of the verdict. It means here the Muslims are in sense that they are being protected from the undesirable incidents against them, by three ways. The direct way of supervising, the security arrangements, by the home minister, sri. P Chidambaram, has definitely made many people to feel this kind precautionary measures if were taken by the then home minister of the .p.v narsimharao government, the structure of babri masjid could not be brought down by the parliamentary political criminal mobs on December 6, 1992. The reaction of the government of India on the verdict also has very calculated move through the selected leaders in the reaction and it appeared that their mind reflected their commitment in maintaining peace in society and control over the over-reacting the "right wing extremists" what he gave the name saffron terrorism. Every one must congratulate the home minister, for his commitment in his job as a home minister. But the question is in my mind about such high alert nationally, for every time does the Indian society and its politics needed in coming days. What would happen, when there is no such home minister to protect the Muslims in future? Is this babri masjid settlement,(including the way of out of court) final settlement with Indian Muslims by the right wing Hindu extremists without going further into the back history of Muslim invasions after Mohammad bin qasim? Do they really give up the anti-Muslim agenda for their political power and killing of the Muslims through the political power and massive violence against the competitive Muslim business areas in many parts of India? Do these forces give up their claim over the thousands of Muslim assets in India? How the Muslim community does accept this verdict in future is a question at present in the minds of many Muslims in India, while filing a petition in the Supreme Court for the protection of future generations of the Indian Muslims. The Muslim community as divided into three categories in which majority of the people accepted the verdict as a matter of peace and security of the Muslim community only. And the method of the judgment, the three member's bench delivered is very tactical and logical in attaining the conclusions of the each point on the issues. It is very simple to understand that the chief justice is argued in very much extreme way in favor of the ram janma bhoomi there on the existing site exactly below the middle part of the masjid. The complete facts behind his verdict could only understood only after going through his 2,666 paged text of the chief justice .D.V Sharma, completely. It is understood that very tactically he opted his opinion to go very extremely to the opinion of the other justice, AU.Khan and justice Agarwal. On the opposite side, justice, Khan claimed exactly in opposition to views and claims of the chief justice. Consequently, justice Agarwal who has taken task of coordinating, as it appears, that the extreme versions and claims are moderated and negotiated to arrive at the points agreeable where the possible result could come out before reducing their versions into writing for the delivery of the judgment which has 5,238 pages, on September 30, 2010. No doubt it is historical day in the history of the relations of the Indian Muslims since the day of demolition of the babri masjid, because the demolition was intentional, preparatory, and successful in the history of the secularism and democracy. The king Baber was demolished or not demolished the ram mandir is not a question. Because it was the period which is belonged to the middle aged history of India in which many cruel acts were taken place, in the streets of the Delhi. The cruelty of the king and the killing of the same Muslim population by the Muslim kings were crueler than the same kings against the Hindus during their period. Some thousands of Muslims were killed by the Muslim kings in the history of the Indian Middle Ages. One example of the cruelty of the Muslim king is enough to understand how was the rule at that time those kings against the other kings irrespective of the religions in India. A king, who was already caught by the emperor and brought into an open view of the people by in a stadium like public place, and ordered his men there to cut his body into thousands of pieces. Then ordered his men to get a bag of rice, and asked their men to mix his flesh with the rice with spice, salt, oil and other pastes to cook in the full views of the public till the flesh and rice was properly cooked there in his direct supervision and control. Then asked his men to get the donkeys into the place and asked them to see all the stuff put to the donkeys and he viewed the entire scene till the completion of the stuff till he satisfied himself that his vengeance was sufficient to the killed. Is any history of the cruelty of the Muslim king against the Hindu kings and their people? In the verdict, the chief justice, dharam veer Sharma has claimed that the declaration of the place of birth, is exactly the place fixed where the idols of ram were installed in the mid night in 1949 and the temporary structure which was made on the day of the December 6, 1992, just because he wanted "not" to remove these idols to any other as a matter of faith only and he believed that the faith of the people on the place where the installation was carried out there and that should not be violated anymore. The place of the installation of the ram idols was firstly he decided and then took the report of ASI in support of his claim. The evidence of existing structure beneath the raised structure as he showed is not enough to believe that the birth of ram was taken birth there only. These two basic questions further lead the minds further to think about him like, when the lord was born, was he really human being, what was the exact date of the birth, in the time line of the Indian history etc. As far as the rig Veda book is concerned I did not find his reference, birth, and his rule of kingdom in exact archaeological findings, is he really taken birth at the exact place of the central place of the babri-masjid. The procedure of examination of evidence and witness is seen that it is completely violated and it is speared that the commitment was fixed and then it was prepared the mind to present with the improper support of the documents in the case. The period, which was set as a parameter to consider and try the case is apparently, speaks a lot about its contradicting versions gauging the evidences in two cases in the entirety of the verdict. The construction model of the babri masjid, when taken into account for the evidence the conditions of the same time, period, nature of the rule, rule of law all these could be admissible for considering as evidence in support of the central part of the verdict. The tenets of Islam in construction the babri masjid, if taken into account, the rule of law of that time allowed owning the place as property of those who possessed that site. If the babri masjid was the construction or renovation of the ram temple, by the monarch, Baber, the site was his property of his kingdom and the law was general that those could plunder the property, gold, ornaments, temples, villages, forts, fortresses, women, queens, ladies, and all the things that could attract the attention of the monarchs. The language, which is now in use mostly in the Hindu fundamentalist sections that Baber was invader and plundered the Indian temples, killed many and raped the women in India, just because it was the rule of law of the society. Might was right. Fittest king was survived. The weak were lost. The jungle law was the law of the land. In the similar way the monarch, emperor, Baber, demolished the ram temple, in some 1527. Or he renovated the mandir, as masjid, or whatever. But the question, about the tenets of Islam in building of the masjid, if attracted into the jurisdiction of the honorable high court, the rule of law of that time was in force also could have been taken into account while reducing his intention into writing as verdict. How does he reject the Indian model of the constructions of the masjids in India is also another question to raise further issues in India. Indian Muslims are and were undoubtedly converted to Islam by many ways. The first masjid was built by the Hindu raja in south Indian state. And the way of the winning territories of small kingdoms in India was the king's heroic duty and they performed their duty. The Muslims never come from out side in begging and in search of the live stock from other parts of the world like Aryans. Muslims never come to live on begging profession in India. Muslim religion was definitely arrived from the Arabian parts and constructed many fortresses contributed a lot to the whole system of Indian society, especially in social equality and equal rule of law in Indian discriminative Manu dharma, which made the whole society as untouchablility, idol worship, as many attracted by the equality and rule law. Still many people of arya samajis say a lot about the idol worshippers, and the rig Vedic society never taught the idol worship. Majority of the Hindus never believe in the killing of the Muslims, but the poor and few youngsters have the history in violence against Muslims for pretty amounts from the right wing extremists in India. The real Hindus, like the real Muslims do not like to kill the Muslims in any way. The bomb blasts as all aware about those who commit it have the extreme views against opposite religion. So in last few incidents the CBI arrested the extremists from Hindu religion. If the date, of the construction and tenets of the Islam in constructing model of the masjids, dargahs, grave yards, prayer grounds and shrines in India, would become admissible as evidence in proving the title to the properties in India, it is very easy to make the red fort, ajmer (dargah), and Hazrath Nizamuddin as disputed by filing any case by anybody in coming days. No wonder, in restricting and allowing these kinds of petitions on title in these courts. The fixation of the time limit for allowing and rejecting the petitions for the title suit over the site of the babri masjid, is not followed the same way of admission of the case. When the act of installation of idols inside the masjid is accepted, then it is become unavoidable to remove the same idols from there because the conviction of the act is found guilty in the verdict. If the claim of the Sunni central board, is dismissed on limitation of the time, how does, the model of construction of the masjid, come into consideration for the verdict in splitting the site into three parts. The allocation of the land into three parts, if it is in justification, according to the verdict, the evidence and supporting documents are apparently not enough to give such strength to make the verdict valid. The verdict is not a matter, of just site of masjid, but it is a matter of serious concern that the way of verdict was based. It is only to give the new way to the Hindu fundamentalist parliamentarian political parties to follow the massive way of violence as well as keeping the threat in the hearts and minds of the average Muslim people India, to continue to the fifth and last level of Hindu religious fold in India, in addition to the four fold chatur varn system as a social system of state's political administration in India. It is also very easy to criticize the working people and the bodies in this legal battle, but all those who are now responding on the verdict did not even know about the date of declaration of the verdict, in last month. The bodies, and political parties such as all India Muslim personal board, Sunni central board, imam of jama masjid, New Delhi, asaduddin Ovaisy, of MIM, Hyderabad, Popular Front of south India, and other eminent jurists, I hope, they would take appropriate steps in finding the most eminent advocates of proven records of success in the national level cases, to engage on hourly paid basis to file and plead the case in the supreme court after consultations with each others in filing the petition. It means it is not my opinion to belittle the efforts and their contributions in filing and arguing the case in the high court. But the Muslims, I can say about, the strength they use more against each other than the elements and the opponents of the Muslims. I am sure, if one Muslim contributes rs.5/ to the Muslim personal law board which would get 75 crores. It is not a big task for Indian Muslims collectively if decided to commit (as a work of Qaum) to contribute in the task of filing and winning the case in Supreme Court in future against the (conspired) verdict in which justice khan has made member to give a color of democracy as a paint to the middle aged jungle law of rule of law. It is another thing, to think the religion which is no way concerned with the social system of productive and non-productive forces in the society, based on classes. and the classification of the people on the classes basis is not enough because they have the mind and heart these determines the changes of the social conditions and the conditions of the society in the real terms of the Marxist philosophy. The faith in religion is personal, when it comes out into streets as a crowd puller on the specific task of getting the power to those who drives the people are definitely belonged to the capitalist and feudal as well as the proletariat sections of the Indian society and they never cease to exists one form only but ever changeable from one to another every time. If any interpretation of the Marxism, as flexible one for accommodating the Muslim masses into it according to the Indian society, is available as option for the Muslims to adopt and support the communist parties, the Indian Muslims never feel alone at the hands of the right wing extremist elements of the Hindu society which has the history and practice to coexist with each other like brothers and sisters of India. Heroes and heroism never come from the might against the weak, but it comes from the true spirit of justice of the few against the might of the majority. Ayub Mohammed
Ayodhya verdict: Ratification to massive parliamentary political violence against Indian Muslim and other minorities in India
