subject: Reasons For The Suppression Of Free Energy Technologies [print this page] Presently everyone is under the perception that the only alternative presently on hand sources for "free" or substitute energy seem to be bio- fuels, solar, wind, or tidal current. They are simply the only range of alternative energy currently being officially endorsed by our respective governments.
The reason why these particular sources of energy are being allowed is that they are relatively expensive, especially on a commercial basis. They simply cannot compete against oil and coal.
And there are problems with these alternatives:
- The wind doesn't always blow and the sun doesn't always shine. But apart from that there are huge technological barriers to harvesting enough energy from these sources to meet the needs of a power-hungry world.
- Bio-fuels rely on agriculture, and apart from moving the production of crops away from food production towards crops for bio-fuels causing starvation in many underdeveloped areas, bio-fuel crops still rely on fossil fuels for cultivation and fertilizers.
- Tidal power technology is still very much in its infancy and can only be feasible in particular geographic locations.
Nuclear power is frequently talked about as a probable alternative to oil, coal or gas it too has its own challenges:
- Apart from the fact that nuclear power plants are extremely expensive to build, they produces radioactive waste and there are considerable security issues involved as well.
The micro-generation of wind and solar energy becomes more affordable if you construct solar or wind generating systems yourself but then again it does take a bit of effort and time.
Free or cheap energy are considered too "dangerous" for the current social model; a model that is centered on energy shortages. Based on the current principles of capitalism, free energy cannot be allowed. The traditional economic system contains three aspects: capital, goods and services. A new social model needs to be created, a model based on energy abundance. Such a paradigm shift would create endless possibilities for improving our world.
Free or cheap energy would allow us to turn deserts into green fields through desalinization of ocean water.
An abundance of free and clean energy would cause the cost of growing food to drop drastically allowing third-world nations to feed themselves.
Free and cheap energy could eventually remove the need to fight over energy resources, water and food.
Unfortunately too many powerful people have a vested interest in the industrial/military complex to allow this to happen. They have a vested interest in WAR.
The other problem is the current energy markets. The energy business turns in the region of 4 to 5 trillion dollars a year. This is vastly superior to the drug trade legal or otherwise or the arms trade.
As a commodity the costs of these fuels for the energy market have grow to be artificially controlled by traders and investors, which is a regrettable state of affairs for consumers.
Free energy would destroy the majority of oil rich countries and a considerable part of the financial organizations.
Therefore when considering the physically possibility that 'free' energy technologies are being suppressed, the economic arguments holds.
The current energy commodities from oil and coal to natural gas are all in some form of competition in the market place and they will not be able to compete with free or cheap renewable energy methods, something that they will not be willing to relinquish.
A further reason for the suppression of "Free energy" systems it that such systems or technologies would completely eliminate our oil-dependent financial systems. Not a bad thing considering what the 'banksters' have done to us recently.
And subsequently let us not overlook the expenses associated to environmental pollution from the consumption of these fuels and also the 'global warming' con politicians and their tame scientists have attempted to and are still trying to use to steal our wealth by means of legislation and carbon taxes. Free, clean and constant energy would stop this scam. Mind you they will try to find something else to try and steal more money from us.
After all in our modern age Energy equals Power and if you control the energy you control the people.
Free energy would likely transform economies globally, and despite the fact that its potential advantages are apparent, may well spark economic and political upheaval in the short term at least.
A shift to free or cheap energy has the power to cause social disruptions as old industries fade and new ones evolve and any government that is bad at managing that change will also go under.
But the move towards 'free energy' may be considered as creative destruction. If free energy was freely available we would find ourselves in the 3rd Industrial Revolution and all kinds of labor saving devices that are currently considered as impractical because of their high-energy use would become viable.
The reason we don't have free energy today is purely down to power and the wish to control people, nothing else.
I believe that in the murky waters of international wheeling and dealing there are moves afoot to allow free energy to be phased in.
This is good news if it were true.
Even if this were true the phasing in will probably be at a snails pace and the world cannot wait for them.
There is a movement on the Internet known as Open Source Energy, which is a collective endeavor that assert that trying to patent and market new alternative energy devices does not work.
Instead we need to combine forces, share our information, build and test our own alternative energy devices. Should enough of us have working, reproducible systems "They" can no longer deny us this knowledge.
Working together for the benefit of all mankind, these brave new Open Source inventors, garage tinkerers, and researchers could eventually reap rewards in excess of those that commercially-minded inventors gain.
