Board logo

subject: The Basic Philosophy [print this page]


Its processing makes no direct reference to some availableness guidelines beyond the requirement to avoid deprecated and bogus presentational markup (which it strips out).

In summary, it addresses the applicatory question

"What *can* we do within the contstraints on us?"

Rather than the more utopian

"What *should* we do in an ideal world?"

Bearing this in mind, mod_accessibility crapper do four things:

1. Transform table in ways probable to meliorate accessibility.

2. Offer users a pick of essentially assorted transforms.

3. Offer the individual summary details: automatic TOC and guidance help.

4. Collect germane external accumulation and inform them to the user.

The prototypal three capabilities of course intersection somewhat with application functions. But browsers that offer momentous similar capabilities bill a earnest technical and scheme charge on the end-user, which haw be unexceptionable in an office surround (where an employer bears the costs on behalf of employees), but not on the Web at large. The fourth would make little sense in a browser, as the disbursement of collecting accumulation crapper only really be justified when accumulation module be mutual between the (many) users of a computer or proxy.

Its processing makes no direct reference to some availableness guidelines beyond the requirement to avoid deprecated and bogus presentational markup (which it strips out).

In summary, it addresses the applicatory question

"What *can* we do within the contstraints on us?"

Rather than the more utopian

"What *should* we do in an ideal world?"

Bearing this in mind, mod_accessibility crapper do four things:

1. Transform table in ways probable to meliorate accessibility.

2. Offer users a pick of essentially assorted transforms.

3. Offer the individual summary details: automatic TOC and guidance help.

4. Collect germane external accumulation and inform them to the user.

The prototypal three capabilities of course intersection somewhat with application functions. But browsers that offer momentous similar capabilities bill a earnest technical and scheme charge on the end-user, which haw be unexceptionable in an office surround (where an employer bears the costs on behalf of employees), but not on the Web at large. The fourth would make little sense in a browser, as the disbursement of collecting accumulation crapper only really be justified when accumulation module be mutual between the (many) users of a computer or proxy.

by: Top Article1




welcome to loan (http://www.yloan.com/) Powered by Discuz! 5.5.0