I however, for my part consider that it is only desire and lust that makes a relationship
be one of true romance and love that be not of a plutonic nature, for when passions (meaning suffering) be present to always be with that certain somebody, regardless of circumstance; it is at this point where there is true adoration. Of course relationships without this sensation can exist as is the case with those whose marriages are prearranged or those who for the sake of convenience enter in to an affair of the amorous kind and it might even be that such unions last longer since they are not based on that which is so fickle as desire and lust. Naturally in affairs like in life there are many options and rarely if ever is there one which in all justice can be called "right for everybody". As this is a matter for each to decide for him or herself yet I ask can these two elements be ignored so easily? Can a couple, who no longer experience either or perhaps never did; in all truth continue the same when one of the two is exposed to them in an uncontrollable form? It in fact being that many will enter a relationship of marriage with the faith that tells them that these are not needed, for theirs brings along that which can serve as their substitute yet when these two arrive they do so like a heat wave which needs to be experienced to be truly appreciated.