Welcome to YLOAN.COM
yloan.com » Legal » Legal Advice - Dangerous Dogs Common Prosecutions
Legal Politics and Government Identity-Theft Living-Will application grants plans factors obama career recommendations defense thanksgiving solutions supplies augmentation popularity employee hiring human criminal exclusive workouts suggestions evaluation schedule suppliers gorgeous recruitment fake registration industries manufacturer employees resources

Legal Advice - Dangerous Dogs Common Prosecutions

The first is under S1 Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 which makes it an offence to possess a dog of a specific breed

. Usually the subject of this legislation is the pit bull terrier. If you possess a pit bull terrier that is not upon the Index of Exempted Dogs you are committing a criminal offence. However, since the Dangerous Dogs Amendment Act 1997 you do have a reasonable chance of avoiding the destruction of your dog if you can show to a Court that the animal is not a danger to the public.

The second is under S3 Dangerous Dogs Act 1991. This section applies to every other dog regardless of its breed or type. This is a criminal offence which can be brought against either the keeper or the person in charge of a dog that is dangerously out of control in a public place. If whilst so out of control your dog injures a person then there is an aggravated offence that can be prosecuted. If an incident takes place in a private place where the dog is not permitted to be then you can be prosecuted under S3 [3] Dangerous Dogs Act 1991. If your dog injures a person then the law requires the Court to presume that it should be destroyed. A destruction order can generally be avoided if you can show that your dog is not a risk to the public.

Members of Chambers also deal with civil complaints brought under the Dogs Act 1871.

If an incident takes place in a private place or involves an injury to another animal then the Crown will usually use the Dogs Act 1871. S2 Dogs Act 1871 is merely a complaint to the Magistrates Court and involves a request that the keeper be required to keep the dog under proper control or destroyed. Proceedings can only be brought against the owner of the dog. It is important to note that a single incident is unlikely to be considered sufficient to prove that the dog is dangerous unless the Court accepts that the incident is an exceptional one. A Court is free to order either destruction of the dog or a Control Order or to make no order at all. Destruction orders under S2 Dogs Act 1871 are very rare.

by: Edison Herriage
Working With Law Firms Where Citizens Will Be Able To Receive Skilled Legal Representation Legal Advice - Dangerous Dogs Common Prosecutions Keeping It Legal What Are The Benefits Of Outsourcing To A Reliable Legal Transcription Company? Reliable Law Firms That Can Solve Different Legal Issues Without Any Hassle Want A Smooth Legal Process? Hire No Win No Fee Lawyers! Well Written Paralegal Resume - The Best Way To Craft Your Reasonable Paralegal Cv Legal Advice - Impact Of Legal Aid Cuts In The Uk Norton Scientific Journal : Russian Startup Pirate Pay Claims To Stop Illegal Downloads When Any Immigration Or Legal Matter Bothers Your Mind, The Relief Is At Manchanda Law Offices Solicitors In St Helen To Fulfil Your Legal Needs Indian Legal Mlm Company - What You Should Must Know? New York Divorce Lawyer Is The Legalized Sanctioning Power
print
www.yloan.com guest:  register | login | search IP(216.73.216.140) California / Anaheim Processed in 0.054724 second(s), 7 queries , Gzip enabled , discuz 5.5 through PHP 8.3.9 , debug code: 8 , 2102, 65,
Legal Advice - Dangerous Dogs Common Prosecutions Anaheim