One-Eyed National Health Care

Author: saichon sannok

Author: saichon sannok

National health systems could be a disaster because of the cost and complexity. A company controlled by the government system also creates agonizing moral dilemmas (on the treatment of eye sentence) read more falling down. Nevertheless, despite my opposition to him, I can see that there is a real possibility, and soon. Keep that in mind, here is what we can solve some of the inherent problems and to make the system work better. What's Your Score Qualys? Who gets what > Health care? It was a difficult decision for any of us would, but some might argue that the bureaucrats at the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) are pretty good about it. They are assessed and approved treatments for the National Health Services Administration in the United Kingdom () their national health care bureaucracy. After all, the life expectancy in Britain is about the same as in the United States, and the government spend less on health> Care while for all citizens. Such decisions do not lead naturally to some interesting problems. An example is recommended: In 2002, NICE, that a certain treatment of macular degeneration are used only in one eye which a less severely affected by the disease. What about the other eye? It's probably allowed to go blind. They came to this decision by clicking "Qualys," or Quality-Adjusted Life Years. As this method works for measuring the value of treatments work? Let'slook at a couple examples. A surgery that gives you an average of ten years of life is better than one that gives you five, and so scores higher on the QUALYs scale. Years added to life matter, but so does quality of those years. Suppose you could be saved by a treatment but be in a coma for six years, while another person could be saved and healthy for six years by some other treatment. If funds are limited (arent they always?), the latter would be approved. Now lets look again at the In the treatment of the eyes. The score for Qualys is high at first glance, because there may be significantly raised the quality of life of blindness. But not increase since the second eye, the quality of life almost as much, right? We do not need the complexity of the system to get to understand the logic. Life issues, but also the quality of life issues, an idea that most of us can agree. But it leads to some uncomfortable conclusions, is not it?. For example, a person with adebilitating disease or disability likely to lower values in Qualys, if for a life as a prolongation of cardiac surgery. They might pass over in favor of a healthier people who would benefit more under the Qualys guests. The truth is usually ignored is that there is a limit to any national health plan. As a result, we make decisions that can certainly make uncomfortable, and sometimes downright disturbing. What happens if was one million U.S. dollarsprevent ten thousand people from always fatal disease, or the same one million could be used to treat and perhaps twenty people who already have the cure disease. Shall we die, twenty to prevent the deaths of ten thousand? http://www.healthcare.pannipa.com/2009/11/one-eyed-national-health-care/About the Author:

POST COMMENT

Sinus Infections - Can Sinus Problems Cause Left Eye Or Right Eye Pain? A Nurse's Guide Be Away From Myopia By Eye Exercise Natural Vision Correction Methods Help You To Take Off Your Glasses Relationship Advice - It's All in the Eyes NLP Eye Movement - A Powerful Technique In Neurolinguistic Programming What Contact Lenses And Glasses Do To Us Speed Reading Training Requires Re-training The Brain, Not Just The Eyes Beneficial Bifocal Lenses Misconceptions In Parents Of Children dark under eye circles Stuck? You May Have Eyes Wide Shut Syndrome Lasik Eye Surgery Guide To Scales Of Breyer Model Horse Toys