Proposed Legal Practitioners Act, 2010 may further worsen the situation?

Proposed Legal Practitioners Act, 2010 may further worsen the situation

?

I have read the proposed Legal Practitioners Act, 2010 and the object may appear to be good, but, it will create so many problems and further damage the profession. When it comes improving the legal system, the unfortunate thing is that we are not addressing the root problem though we are interested to make laws. Except the issue of "All India Bar Council Examination" and the issue of Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill, I have not seen any practical and reasonable steps towards correcting our legal system and strengthening it. By reading the provisions of Legal Practitioners Act, 2010, I find that an impression is sought to be created that clients are being cheated by the Legal Practitioners. It is true that there are professionals who cheat the clients and who do not follow any principles. It is also true that there are habitual litigants or publicwhose only job is to play with the legal system and I have personally seen these kinds of litigants. Legal Professionals who believe in might and getting the things done at any cost may be spared by habitual litigants or public, but, the principled advocates will often get harassed by the litigants or the public. One should not see the legal profession at par with other professions like Medical Profession. The relationship between the client and the legal professional is very complex and it is very difficult to know as to what has happened between them and one can not also easily infer things based on versions or based on what has been recorded by the court during the course of the proceeding. One should not defend the lawyers who do not follow any standards and principles and they should be strictly dealt with. But, at the same time, it is also important to protect the legal professionals from the frivolous complaints and it will cause irreparable damage to the legal professional and it leads to deviation. If the complaints against legal professionals sought to be entertained loosely, then, there should be stringent provisions against frivolous complainants. We have obsolete fee rules and it may require a re-look and revision.

While a disciplinary action is to be taken against the professionals clearly deviating from standards which require a revision, certain issues can very easily be addressed. As per the practice, if a client wants to change his advocate, then, he has to get the consent from the advocate concerned. The object behind this mechanism may be good, but, it is being misused. The legal professionals may fight for their fees independently, but, they should not be allowed to prevent the client in changing his contractual service. On the same footing, a legal professional should be allowed to get discharged from the case ona Memo to the court and on many occasions, legal professional may have to face harassment from the client or the client may insist the advocate to defend a clearly mis-leading case. By taking these simple steps, the issues can be addressed. I am very firm on one thing that legal professionals should not forced to serve the public as a charity and it should be left to the discretion of the professional concerned. The regulations governing the legal professionals should be realistic. On the same lines, Hon'ble Judges may feel that frivolous complaints can be made against them. But, the only worry is that there is no mechanism at all earlier to deal with the clearly corrupt judges and now, it is sought to be addressed.

Plethora of complaints can be filed against the legal professionals if the proposed law is implemented and it doen't mean that the legal professionals are wrong always and we should also beaware of the people who always try to abuse the process of law. We have consumer redressl forums now and everybody knows about the frivolous complaints too. As such,habituallitigants should not be allowed to harassa legal professional andif is allowed to happen,then, it will further worsen profession. If effective mechanism sought to be established against the legal professionals to deal with theprofessional indiscipline, then, there should be clear provisions thattechnicalities be ignored in the course of proceeding andthere should bea provision for stringent action againstfalse complaints. There should also be a provision, based on the averments in thecomplaint, to demand the complainant to provide a bond orguarantee that he will compensate the damage to the professional in the event ofcomplaint getting proved as false/motivated. I can give plenty of examples as to howa legal professional can be an easy target forhabitual litigants under the cover of consumer protection etc.

I don't understand thereforms being mooted and Istronglyfeel that the root problems are not being addressed properly. We don't want eye-wash action and we want concrete steps which will work.

Note: the views expressed are my personal.

POST COMMENT

Credit Card Debt Bailouts – Tips To Legally Eliminate Credit Card Debt Debt Resolution – A Legal Way To Settle Your Debts For Less Illegal Workers And Identity Theft How A Dangerous Products Lawyer Can Guide For Justice Within The Legal Limits Debt settlement companies - how to legally settle unsecured debt for less Five Common Sense Things Oil Spill Victims Can Do to Preserve Your Legal Rights Paralegal – Encourage Equality and Promote Justice Choosing A Debt Settlement Lawyer To Avoid Legal Problems The Legal Concerns with Short Sales Find Legal Assistance Today If You Blame Metoclopramide (Reglan) For Your Tardive Dyskinesia If You Are Suffering From Reglan Tardive Dyskinesia, Then Now Is The Time To Find Legal Help Free Credit Score Check: Legally Possible Acquire Practical Legal Knowledge Of Law Courses At Jeen Institute Of Law