Science versus philosophy collapses at the frontiers of questioning! At the big bang

Science versus philosophy collapses at the frontiers of questioning! At the big bang

Science versus philosophy collapses at the frontiers of questioning! At the big bang

Few centuries ago Laplace, Bacon and Descartes depicted the criterion of science and scientific method. They drew out for us how should we think scientifically.

They have established certain specific laws for science and scientific reasoning. Ever since science has advanced and progressed in a certain factual framework. This framework drew out the limits of accepting things as they are, investigating into the sensible. The intelligible is accepted, according o the scientific way of thinking, in as far as the hypotheses and theories can be proven.

Scientific thinking accepts things as true if they can be subject to verification. The absence of the criterion of verification annuls the validity of scientific truth. Everything, in order to be accepted, an entity for example, ought to be reduced to its last details, and every detail must be verified and proved, by repetition of phenomena. Then the details are reconstructed into a whole.

Such conclusions, reached by induction and deduction must be accepted by all scientific observer. The Newton law of gravity for example shows this clearly. The force of gravity found in the atom being part of its physical constants is absolutely necessary for the existence and structure of the universe, its moment, its dilution and its life manifestations.

This represents the edge razor perspective where gravity is applied in one particular aspect of our universe and without it nothing would ever exist.

Any modulation or change in its perspective and the whole fine tuning of the structure of the universe and its evolution would be catastrophic, and life would not be possible, maybe at a very simple bacteria level.

The edge of razor also is applicable to where we leave science and depart into the intelligible unseen, or the unobservable and non-verifiable. Science is all too well to explain how a phenomenon is made but it never ventures in why a phenomenon is made. It is limited to what our minds and senses can experience but does not go beyond to see whether or not a creating-cause is at the heart of it.

So if science deals with what is verifiable philosophy of the science deals with the non-verifiable. The non-verifiable is none sense for the scientist and hence he does not accept it as valid. Everything in the universe must be produced at the level of his laboratory, being subject to mathematical, physical and chemical as ell as biological proof. Metaphysical philosophy is not acceptable to scientific proof and hence is discarded by scientists.

In this, scientists miss the most important and most interesting part of their game: a creator-cause that made them and their subjects of investigation.

The short coming of all sciences is its collapse at the big bang singularity zero point!

Neither science, nor philosophy, nor metaphysics can produce a proof for God's existence yet everything in science, philosophy and metaphysics indicate such God. Einstein, as a foremost scientist, believed in God as a mysterious mystic figure that is at the heart of the universe. Science and belief do not contradict one another!

POST COMMENT

Lingerie: One of the best Valentine's gifts Public display of Lingerie Feel sexier than ever with silk lingerie Past and Present Lingerie How To Buy Australian Lingerie Searching for perfect lingerie? Lingerie Retailer - Fulfill Dream of Luscious Feminine Mystique Why Most Girls Enjoy To Put on Attractive Lingerie Hot Lingerie Leave Plenty To The Imagination Lingerie: trends fashion Spring summer 2011 Best Various Models Of Hot Lingerie Exotic Cheap Lingerie Management philosophy